My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
102020
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 1:29:20 PM
Creation date
10/14/2020 10:26:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/20/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Narum asked for a more precise definition of `distribution' as mentioned in the proposed <br /> ordinance. Assistant City Attorney Seto clarified distribution as selling, giving away or otherwise <br /> furnishing to underage persons, in which case the offender would be subject to the California Penal Code. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum, Assistant City Attorney Seto replied that tobacco vending <br /> machines are still legal in tobacco stores where it is age-restricted to enter; the City does not have the <br /> ability to ban vending machines. <br /> In reply to Councilmember Pentin, Chief Eicher clarified that because of the limited number of violators, <br /> counseling is done on an individual rather than a group basis. <br /> Councilmember Pentin asked how the City would enforce the proposed requirement that some tobacco <br /> retailers 'go dark'. In response, Assistant City Attorney Seto suggested that this requirement may create <br /> problems with the First Amendment as it would be targeting a legal product. <br /> In response to Councilmember Pentin, Assistant City Attorney Seto replied that the City's current tobacco <br /> retailers have been noticed concerning this subject and giving them 6 months delay in addition, they have <br /> sufficient time to sell their current inventory before the prohibitions go into effect. <br /> Councilmember Testa inquired about the grandfathering language in the proposed ordinance. In reply <br /> Assistant City Attorney Seto stated that the proposed ordinance indicates that if a business currently <br /> selling tobacco is sold, the new business may continue to sell tobacco. <br /> In reply to Councilmember Testa, Assistant City Attorney Seto stated that the $1,000 fine would be <br /> imposed on the business owner, not the clerk. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa, Assistant City Attorney Seto explained that the City's position on <br /> underage offenders is in alignment with the State law because the State does not punish or regulate <br /> possession. <br /> Councilmember Brown expressed concern about whether the policies of the proposed ordinance would <br /> affect the relationship between minors and the Police Department. She questioned whether potential <br /> counseling would make the minors feel like criminals. Chief Eicher explained that the School District has <br /> a program in place to deal with this issue and most of the contact between the students and Police <br /> Department concerning tobacco takes place in a school setting, and therefore would be dealt with by <br /> counseling in the school. <br /> Councilmember Brown questioned how the age-appropriate counseling would happen and how long the <br /> counseling would last. Chief Eicher commented that these are details that still have to be worked out. <br /> Councilmember Brown expressed concern as to why Council is delegating policy making to the City <br /> Manager as Council is tasked with developing City policy. Assistant City Attorney Seto replied that <br /> Council has delegated authority to the City Manager in the past and staff feels like it is the appropriate <br /> action for this issue. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 8 May 5. 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.