My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020
>
102020
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 1:29:20 PM
Creation date
10/14/2020 10:26:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/20/2020
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
other cities in Alameda County have a similar buffer, but it does not apply to private schools or tutoring <br /> facilities or other types of private businesses. <br /> Assistant City Attorney Seto stated that the Planning Commission clarified its recommendation, wanting <br /> either the 'grandfathering' to be more strict, asking that it only occur along with the requirement that <br /> tobacco stores and retailers not display their tobacco products; or if not then prohibit all tobacco sales <br /> within the 1,000 foot buffer and provide 12-18 months before enforcement. <br /> Assistant City Attorney Seto noted that Staff's recommendation is to adopt the 1,000-foot buffer for new <br /> tobacco sales and grandfather existing businesses like all other cities which adopted buffers. An <br /> alternative recommendation is to adopt Planning Commission's recommendation to prohibit all tobacco <br /> sales within that buffer. This was also the Youth Commission's recommendation. <br /> Assistant City Attorney Seto stated that the fourth item discussed from the ordinance is delegation to the <br /> City Manager to establish a Tobacco Retailer Licensing (TRL) program. In February, Council indicated <br /> they wanted a program with `teeth' which included fines, suspension, and TRL revocation. <br /> Assistant City Attorney Seto stated the final item proposes updating the code to provide that possession <br /> of tobacco products by persons under 21 would be subject to confiscation and referral to counseling. This <br /> would not impose any criminal penalties or fines for possession. <br /> Assistant City Attorney Seto advised that if the ordinance is introduced tonight and adopted at the May <br /> 19, 2020 Council meeting, it would become legally effective on June 20, thirty days after adoption. Staff <br /> recommends that the provisions regarding the 1,000-foot buffer, TRL, and possession by persons under <br /> 21 go into effect immediately. Staff further recommends that the prohibition on the sale of flavored <br /> tobacco and electronic smoking devices be delayed for 12 months to give retailers the opportunity to sell <br /> their current inventory and update their business model. Assistant City Attorney Seto presented <br /> alternative effective dates for prohibition on the sale of flavored tobacco and electronic smoking devices <br /> as follows: <br /> • November 6, 2020 6 months after introduction <br /> • December 21, 2020 6 months after effective date <br /> • January 1, 2021 beginning of the new year <br /> • May 6, 2021 12 months after introduction <br /> • June 21, 2021 12 months after effective date (recommended) <br /> • Unknown 6-12 months after lifting of shelter-in-place for retail stores <br /> In response to Mayor Thorne, Assistant City Attorney Seto replied that she has seen a 6-month <br /> implementation delay in Dublin and unincorporated areas of Alameda County. She also confirmed that <br /> Council is still considering minimum package sizes and pricing, use of coupons, and the effective date. <br /> In response to Councilmember Narum, Assistant City Attorney Seto confirmed that staff recommends <br /> that Council adopt an ordinance to delegate authority to the City Manager to adopt an administrative <br /> policy that would require every tobacco retailer to be licensed and to adhere to the prohibitions and <br /> penalties put in place with the new ordinance. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 3 of 8 May 5. 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.