Laserfiche WebLink
MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC <br />10. Public Comment <br />Ron Payne, retired Army veteran, addressed the City Council and thanked them for their support at <br />Las Positas College. He announced an event honoring women veterans and invited the entire <br />community to celebrate. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />11. Review and provide direction on key planning considerations, project approach and scope of work <br />for completion of the East Pleasanton Specific Plan. <br />Mayor Thorne inquired as to the Council's preference to address this item as there are a number of <br />public speakers who would like to provide testimony. Councilmembers unanimously stated they <br />would like to receive staff's report and public testimony. <br />Director of Community Development Ellen Clark reported staff was providing this presentation in <br />order to seek Council's direction on key planning considerations, project approach and scope of <br />work for completion of the East Pleasanton Specific Plan (EPSP). She noted this item came before <br />the City Council in November 2019, although it started in 2012 and stopped in 2015. City Council <br />Resolution 15-766 stated that a restarting of the project must come through future City Council <br />priority -setting. Director Clark noted the 2019/2020 work plan provisions which stated the EPSP <br />restart as a Priority "A" item. On November 19, 2019 the City Council conducted initial discussion <br />and provided input on approach, scope and schedule of the project. <br />Director Clark displayed the plan area and boundaries, which is an approximately 100 acre property. <br />She noted the boundaries requested by the City Council included urban growth boundaries (UGB) <br />inside and outside City limits. There were several key planning components which were <br />contemplated including boundaries and development within the UGB, land use mix and housing <br />affordability, circulation as related to EI Charro Road and the East-West Connector, public facilities, <br />including Pleasanton Garbage Service (PGS) relocation, school site, and maintenance facility, and <br />the trail network, including the future Iron Horse Trail. Other components included airport protection <br />area, utilities, fiscal and financial issues with no impact on ratepayers or fiscal burden to the City, <br />environmental impacts and a phased planning approach which should include no construction <br />ahead of the 2023 Housing Element. <br />Director Clark spoke regarding the EPSP process approach including using the Planning <br />Commission for guidance, frequent City Council review to "set the course," stakeholder engagement <br />with PUSD, Zone 7, PGS, and the County, a robust citywide public process, including public <br />workshops and meetings, and a process driven by the City, not the developer, including <br />reimbursement -based funding for consultant services directed and managed by staff. <br />Director Clark spoke about how the EPSP will relate to the Regional Housing Needs Allocation <br />(RHNA) process. The RHNA process will allocate the city's "fair share" of regional housing need for <br />the next Housing Element. The Housing Element update will include the 2022-2030 RHNA and it is <br />staff's plan to coordinate the EPSP and Housing Element processes, with the final EPSP adjusted <br />to the outcomes of the Housing Element sites analysis. Director Clark displayed the EPSP and <br />Housing Element proposed timeline with related tasks and requirements with project kickoff planned <br />for Spring 2020. Land use alternatives and refinement of EPSP base land use plan will be reviewed <br />through Spring 2021, with a draft RHNA issued in approximately February/March of 2021. <br />City Council Minutes Page 3 of 14 February 18, 2020 <br />