Laserfiche WebLink
Tree Report, 218 Ray Street, Pleasanton Ed Brennan, Consulting Arborist <br /> February 12, 2020 Page 1 <br /> Introduction and Overview <br /> Win Structural Consulting Group, Inc. is planning to build an office building located at 218 <br /> Ray Street in Pleasanton. Ed Brennan, Consulting Arborist, was asked to prepare a Tree <br /> Preservation Report for the project for review by the City of Pleasanton. <br /> This report provides the following information: <br /> 1. A survey of trees currently growing on the site. <br /> 2. An evaluation of each tree's suitability for preservation. <br /> 3. An evaluation of the value of each tree in U.S. Dollars <br /> 4. An assessment of the impacts of constructing the proposed project on the trees. <br /> 5. Guidelines for preserving selected trees during development. <br /> Survey Methods <br /> Trees were surveyed on February 7, 2020. The survey included trees greater than 6" in <br /> diameter. The survey procedure consisted of the following steps: <br /> 1. Identifying the tree as to species; <br /> 2. Tagging each tree with an identifying number and recording its location on a <br /> map; <br /> 3. Measuring the trunk diameter at a point 54" above grade; <br /> 4. Measuring the dripline in the four cardinal directions. <br /> 5. Evaluating the health and structural condition using a scale of 1 —5: <br /> 5-A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of disease, <br /> with good structure and form typical of the species. <br /> 4-Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor <br /> structural defects that could be corrected. <br /> 3-Tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning <br /> of crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be <br /> mitigated with regular care. <br /> 2-Tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large <br /> branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. <br /> 1 -Tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most of <br /> foliage from epicormics; extensive structural defects that cannot be abated. <br /> 0—Tree is dead <br /> 6. Rating the suitability for preservation as"good", "moderate"or"poor". Suitability <br /> for preservation considers the health, age and structural condition of the tree, <br /> and its potential to remain an asset to the site for years to come. <br /> Good: Trees with good health and structural stability that have the <br /> potential for longevity at the site. <br /> Moderate: Trees with somewhat declining health and/or structural defects <br /> than can be abated with treatment. The tree will require more <br /> intense management and monitoring, and may have shorter life <br /> span than those in `good' category. <br /> Poor. Tree in poor health or with significant structural defects that <br /> cannot be mitigated. Tree is expected to continue to decline, <br /> regardless of treatment. The species or individual may have <br /> characteristics that are undesirable for landscapes, and <br /> generally are unsuited for use areas. <br />ti i#rte ". 4„� x'a„Pl. <br /> • Gott -� e tliN�1,N6' <br /> �.' �` � " ' 14, <br /> �� w,,fes Vie" k'z. , * ,,r" ,'::/.....7%.":;.** Si'. Pak ti c, s*s P1N�'` �` Rj � ottingcr <br /> ® ��� 1., ,...1 •,,,� swy '`4. 'a�.�1R -J;:,,� °'' i. ", �• I .1~,. w: l� "e' r.a ",, ,1„lsi,ii'L <br /> • gyp. •♦ i *'',,,s v a. ;i ♦r y tQ�� "' a •`Q, ' "' 4', t`. '' „k o '�'"W <br /> nA, j <br /> •• • ^--- `'' 1 a„ + 1� ��« c 1.{.:4'. <br /> `ys s P = `‘ AC ` o,a'isaaaua'�1 a ,1.,9� "°�• <br /> } * yo- r e 7 X �S:`, yqJ '_ i ti+ "x',. y �3 f � 4, t <br /> Iv <br /> 7. <br /> .. .��, ERI;I L ;; ,,�• L`D .13LRNAL ., / Ee ('�11� n 1 .e. 7r `� t, - wan <br /> 2 t� ti► 't 6 y ;.4.'"...'-is <br /> f 1' '* uw (� 7 <br /> J1r <br /> 1:6,580 <br /> o 0.075 0.'5 mi P20-0568, 218 RAY ST, NAG U I BMftelISISM <br /> Planning Division <br /> 0 i <br /> 0 4110 820 Feet l August 17,2ozo ['L-EA AN foN. <br />