PC-2003-52 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2003-52 Page Two businesses' ability to operate. The proposed indoor facility would have four pitching mounds. The anticipated number of coaches, players and parents will not generate any unusual demands on the existing parking for this industrial area or the surrounding properties as the parking lot on site provides adequate parking spaces. Furthermore, the applicant will be required to mitigate any nuisances that may occur as a result of the proposed indoor baseball pitching facility. Therefore, this finding can be made. 2. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Based on the proposal, the operation of the proposed facility would be compatible with other uses in the same zoning district, as its operation would be confined inside the building with a maximum of four players and two coaches. The subject facility is approximately 1,300 feet from the nearest residential property on the west side of I 680. It is unlikely that the proposed use would impact the residential neighborhood. The applicants would add foam padding to the common walls and would install catching nets along the walls to minimize potential noise impacts from practice upon adjacent businesses. In addition, adequate and safe ingress and egress into and out of the site and sufficient on-site parking would make the proposed use suitable for the subject site. Therefore, this finding can be made. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. The I-G zoning district conditionally permits the establishment of a recreation facility, and the proposed indoor baseball pitching facility is considered a recreational use. Granting a conditional use permit would be consistent with the City's ability to regulate related zoning regulations. Therefore, the third finding can be made. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed conditional use would be compatible with the existing uses in the area. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: