|
Figure 1: Aerial of the Site
<br /> and Surrounding Area.,,
<br /> j
<br /> '-
<br /> ;P.
<br /> BART S PARKING LOT
<br /> 40
<br /> ()wens ,i.";
<br /> ®wens IDF
<br /> 111.411%, °wens Dr ,,. 40;1
<br /> ,,
<br /> ''''..-7:,
<br /> --,.._-. - _
<br /> , . ,,,, f ' --1,- —
<br /> tt"el
<br /> 0 fp 44 " ####fOt 58004wens w've
<br /> - .i .,_,,,,r.....06 ....-, .- ' g • ' -
<br /> .- 1,49x1407,--azird 1 1 - ' ' ) -i= * 1 I t
<br /> s ra,c..- -tancl.....,,
<br /> THE GALLOWAY
<br /> 1 ,
<br /> r
<br /> S SUBJECT SITE
<br /> APARTMENTS
<br /> I
<br /> ,..,,e 5860 OWENS DRIVE
<br /> 7Z-.
<br /> ` ; 1 _ .....
<br /> - - ' ..' .4
<br /> zit." x
<br /> :*I t
<br /> ' T I ,,. -11, 1
<br /> 44
<br /> `i 4 i
<br /> .„.. p %if ,.
<br /> 111
<br /> .:* fir iiit. 40 il ,--
<br /> _
<br /> '4.- ic.i,L mat -19 -',7:-.-.• 4„.. '- n - qt. , hb *
<br /> ..m.„00,
<br /> 7-4- i -- , ;tan= 21.....iipr , ts aimpor•f,
<br /> rkin.---
<br /> 1 4
<br /> :24 HOUR FITNESS r
<br /> . aillilliMia, '
<br /> ,•••'
<br /> Figure 2: Front Elevation along Owens Drive (3RD Floor indicated)
<br /> -
<br /> te eilltw:'''tA
<br /> . -
<br /> L'.JOHN MUIR.Fl EA-IT . . ,...e„,
<br /> ,*,,litil
<br /> ._.
<br /> 4,--..
<br /> ...,.,,-..---,,....--._----- --
<br /> ..,
<br /> c.•ro.. ..
<br /> • „.-, ,, _06;aiiiiii, , „ ,
<br /> _
<br /> ,r
<br /> )
<br /> „..
<br /> ,
<br /> —
<br /> ,.. ,41 1,....
<br /> at- •-.= IP...0g
<br /> 4 -
<br /> 7...-
<br /> .„...
<br /> - '- - --
<br /> P20-0350, 5860 Owens Drive, 3rd Floor Planning Commission
<br /> 3 of 9
<br />al of 415 parking spaces are
<br /> located on the site, all of which are shared between the tenants of the building.
<br /> P20-0350, 5860 Owens Drive, 3rd Floor Planning Commission
<br /> 2 of 9
<br />
<br /> units as a comparison.
<br /> Commissioner Balch stated he was amenable to the general massing referenced in Discussion
<br /> Point 3 and mentioned that the option selected is the slightly better choice.
<br /> Commissioner Ritter discussed the layout and positioning and to Commissioner Allen's point,
<br /> agreed with her comments around the importance of traffic circulation; he further stated the
<br /> massing is all-encompassing of that and requested additional articulation on the building
<br /> design.
<br /> Commissioner Brown expressed concern with the wrap-around building and the view from
<br /> Stoneridge Mall Road.
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 9 March 11, 2020
<br />already
<br /> approved and accounted for increased congestion. He discussed the pedestrian and bicycle
<br /> traffic and the future amenities, including the cycle track, which would help improve circulation.
<br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 9 March 11, 2020
<br />20
<br /> Actions of the City Council
<br />
|