My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibits A & C-G
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
01-22
>
3_Exhibits A & C-G
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2020 12:23:20 PM
Creation date
1/16/2020 12:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/2020
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\01-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In addition, the General Plan Land Use Policy concerning holding capacity states: <br /> Policy 11: Residential density is determined by the General Plan density range or <br /> applicable specific plan as outlined below: <br /> Residential projects proposed for land designated as Low- and Medium-Density <br /> Residential should propose densities generally consistent with the average <br /> densities assumed for buildout of the General Plan, as shown in Table 2-3. <br /> Low- and Medium-Density projects which propose densities greater than the <br /> average shown in Table 2-3 should be zoned PUD and contain sufficient public <br /> amenities to justify the higher density. Examples of amenities which might qualify <br /> a project for density bonus include the provision of affordable housing; and <br /> dedication and/or improvement of parkland, open space, and/or trails beyond the <br /> standard requirements. <br /> The proposal currently does not include any amenities to justify a density greater than the <br /> average density of 1.0 du/acre. <br /> North Sycamore Specific Plan <br /> Land Use Designations: The NSSP land use designation for the site is PUD-A, which allows <br /> for a maximum of one dwelling unit per acre, or up to three units on the 3.28-acre site. In <br /> addition, the NSSP's discussion of Minimum Parcel Size, this site is one of thirteen where the <br /> Minimum Lot Size is also listed as one (1) acre. (See NSSP pg. 29.) As shown in Table 1, the <br /> proposed Specific Plan Amendment would change the land use designation of the northern, <br /> approximately one acre portion of the site to PUD-LDR. <br /> Per the NSSP, "Development within [the PUD-LDR]district is generally intended to conform <br /> with the provisions and permitted uses contained in the R-1 One Family Residential District of <br /> the...Municipal Code, with a minimum parcel size of 12,000 square feet on flat land and <br /> 15,000 square feet on sloping land and land which is located south of the east-west collector <br /> or adjacent to the northern plan border(gross density of 2 units per acre)." (NSSP, page 30). <br /> The NSSP also lists and describes the allowable land uses in the PUD-LDR district which <br /> include "low density residential at a density of 0-2 units/gross acre." The portion of the site <br /> proposed for re-designation is 1.01 acres, resulting in an equivalent density of 3.0 dwelling <br /> units per acre, and which is above the allowable density range for the NSSP PUD-LDR district. <br /> The PUD process may allow for some flexibility in how conformance to the NSSP required <br /> density is calculated (for example, by averaging across the entire property, developed as a <br /> single PUD). Otherwise, alternative proposals such as reducing the number of lots from 5 to 4, <br /> or designating the entire property PUD-LDR to resolve this apparent conflict may be <br /> necessary. <br /> NSSP Buildout: Although not intended as a development standard or "cap" the NSSP includes <br /> a calculation of the maximum number of new residential units expected to develop in the <br /> Specific Plan area based on available land and allowable development intensities. The PUD- <br /> LDR district encompasses Bridle Creek and Sycamore Heights subdivisions, and some other <br /> P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission <br /> 9 of 16 <br />wed than the number of residential lots/homes permitted by the <br /> NSSP. Although no formal vote was taken, in discussion, the majority of the Commission was <br /> supportive of the potential NSSP amendment and allowing some additional development on <br /> P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 16 <br />be recommended for approval, <br /> subject to the necessary conditions of approval. <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> 21 of 23 <br /> .+� s1. <br /> i� 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36. <br /> ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k <br /> 3S 94 '@ g 'via <br /> R T3 <br /> 1:5,300 <br /> 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _ <br /> January 7 2020 `( �� ""��� <br /> 0 330 660 Feet I Y <br /> I , I I <br />