My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibits A & C-G
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
01-22
>
3_Exhibits A & C-G
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2020 12:23:20 PM
Creation date
1/16/2020 12:22:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/22/2020
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\01-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
properties, some of which are subdivided and others which are not. For this area, the Specific <br /> Plan identifies a total of 208 units, including 13 existing and 195 new units. <br /> Table 2 shows the breakdown the existing 190 residential units in PUD-LDR of the NSSP. <br /> There are three properties that remain to be developed, with a maximum of 12 units estimated. <br /> Based on these figures, it appears that three additional units in PUD-LDR could be <br /> accommodated on this site, without exceeding the anticipated "buildout" of the NSSP. <br /> Table 2: Breakdown of Units Constructed in NSSP PUD-LDR Area <br /> Number of <br /> Residential Units Notes <br /> Total Number of New <br /> Units Allowed by 208 <br /> NSSP in PUD-LDR <br /> Breakdown of the 190 units: <br /> Existing Units 190 Bridle Creek = 111 <br /> Sycamore Heights = 48 <br /> Other Areas = 31 <br /> Future Development 12 <br /> Subtotal 202 <br /> Proposed Land Use 3 Will add 3 units to PUD-LDR <br /> Change <br /> Total 205 { Overall units in PUD-LDR would <br /> remain compliant to NSSP <br /> Development Standards <br /> Both the PUD-A and PUD-LDR designations anticipate that zoning of the property will occur <br /> through the Planned Unit Development review and approval process specified in the <br /> Pleasanton Municipal Code, including adoption of corresponding PUD zoning and a site- <br /> specific PUD plan that includes applicable development standards for the property. <br /> Table 3 provides a comparison of the conformance of the project and/or proposed <br /> development standards, with applicable standards identified in the NSSP. Key aspects of this <br /> conformance are discussed in more detail below. Note that the analysis generally focuses on <br /> the proposed land use designations and standards and the project's conformance to them (i.e. <br /> comparing the proposed PUD-LDR parcels, to the PUD-LDR standards), rather than a <br /> comparison between the requirements of the PUD-A designation and the proposed PUD-LDR <br /> parcels. However, this information can be extrapolated from the tables provided. <br /> Lot Dimensions <br /> Table 3 compares required to proposed lot dimensions. As shown, all of the proposed parcels <br /> would conform to the applicable standards, with lots dimensions that meet or exceed those <br /> required. <br /> P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission <br /> 10 of 16 <br />owable density range for the NSSP PUD-LDR district. <br /> The PUD process may allow for some flexibility in how conformance to the NSSP required <br /> density is calculated (for example, by averaging across the entire property, developed as a <br /> single PUD). Otherwise, alternative proposals such as reducing the number of lots from 5 to 4, <br /> or designating the entire property PUD-LDR to resolve this apparent conflict may be <br /> necessary. <br /> NSSP Buildout: Although not intended as a development standard or "cap" the NSSP includes <br /> a calculation of the maximum number of new residential units expected to develop in the <br /> Specific Plan area based on available land and allowable development intensities. The PUD- <br /> LDR district encompasses Bridle Creek and Sycamore Heights subdivisions, and some other <br /> P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission <br /> 9 of 16 <br />wed than the number of residential lots/homes permitted by the <br /> NSSP. Although no formal vote was taken, in discussion, the majority of the Commission was <br /> supportive of the potential NSSP amendment and allowing some additional development on <br /> P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 16 <br />be recommended for approval, <br /> subject to the necessary conditions of approval. <br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission <br /> 990 Sycamore Road <br /> 21 of 23 <br /> .+� s1. <br /> i� 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36. <br /> ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k <br /> 3S 94 '@ g 'via <br /> R T3 <br /> 1:5,300 <br /> 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _ <br /> January 7 2020 `( �� ""��� <br /> 0 330 660 Feet I Y <br /> I , I I <br />