|
this property, seeing it as a way to logically continue the now-established development pattern
<br /> along Sycamore Creek Road. The Commission indicated the three lots/homes fronting
<br /> Sycamore Creek Way would need to have comparable lot sizes and similar setbacks and
<br /> architecture/design as the homes in the Sycamore Heights development and to provide an
<br /> appropriate transition between new lots and existing lots fronting Sycamore Creek Way at
<br /> either end of the site, noting that the lot size and setback varied between the lots to the east
<br /> and to the west.
<br /> Following the 2008 workshop, no further action was taken by the applicant to pursue the
<br /> development of the site, until the current preliminary review submittal.
<br /> PROJECT DESCRIPTION
<br /> As noted, the current application is somewhat similar to the previously proposed PUD-53,
<br /> including an amendment to the NSSP to: (a) change zoning and increase density to allow the
<br /> existing approximately 3.28-acre parcel to be developed with five single-family residential lots
<br /> where three lots are allowed by the NSSP; (b) have lots take access on Sycamore Creek Way
<br /> where the NSSP only allows access via Sycamore Road; and (c) realignment of the trail.
<br /> In the proposed development plan (see Figure 6), the southern approximately 2.26-acre
<br /> portion of the property would retain its existing Planned Unit Development-Agriculture (PUD-A)
<br /> land use designation, and would be divided into two lots (Lots 1 and 2), with Lot 2 containing
<br /> the existing single-family residence. The northern 1.02 acres of the property would be re-
<br /> designated from PUD-A to Planned Unit Development - Low Density Residential (PUD-LDR),
<br /> and divided into three roughly equal sized lots (Lots 3, 4 and 5).
<br /> Figure 6: Proposed Layout
<br /> Lot 1_ Lot 4 iLot5
<br /> PUD-LDR
<br /> •
<br /> ro1Lot 2
<br /> fes ' -_, PUD-A E 4Strnif
<br /> Nc�sidex,
<br /> KA' tot 1
<br /> -
<br /> .„>vvof
<br /> P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission
<br /> 7 of 16
<br />r- ;r, / i y' r�'�. NSSP Approved Multi- a ' - �.,�lilv-.�J� ' t1, � L_
<br /> --- J Use Trail Alignment It" '' t ' ,./.44,1,,„,„,
<br /> 4'1�� ,j' f f '' _1.-„4,
<br /> �✓ �'+/ J —'�1it:tial. t �0'i i�.�
<br /> J f/�f�J��vy+7
<br /> ^�. ! 1 Y f r I ,i�. _ _
<br /> ).......}4-, -----I-7_,.
<br /> iii,,,,,,0 ,f, ea/,
<br /> _----- fV3
<br /> i •-...,.........i f -'17 i
<br /> ' +�` �� � Proposed Trail —1 ,
<br /> r 1 Alignment ,
<br /> trrr
<br /> .lopes generally "*- '�'"— - - . _ — __ ` , __�_—
<br /> r
<br /> .hove 10 percent. -'f . f /4-,`�. / �� ``-..
<br /> PUD-53 - March 2008 Planning Commission Work Session
<br /> In March 2008 the Planning Commission held a preliminary work session on the proposed
<br /> PUD. (See Exhibit C for the prior Planning Commission staff report and minutes.)
<br /> The Planning Commission questioned and was concerned about the City's prior decision to
<br /> allow site grading and stubbing of utilities prior to receiving project approvals, and that more
<br /> utility laterals had been allowed than the number of residential lots/homes permitted by the
<br /> NSSP. Although no formal vote was taken, in discussion, the majority of the Commission was
<br /> supportive of the potential NSSP amendment and allowing some additional development on
<br /> P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission
<br /> 6 of 16
<br />be recommended for approval,
<br /> subject to the necessary conditions of approval.
<br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission
<br /> 990 Sycamore Road
<br /> 21 of 23
<br /> .+� s1.
<br /> i� 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36.
<br /> ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k
<br /> 3S 94 '@ g 'via
<br /> R T3
<br /> 1:5,300
<br /> 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _
<br /> January 7 2020 `( �� ""���
<br /> 0 330 660 Feet I Y
<br /> I , I I
<br />
|