|
PUD-53: Bringhurst Property Five-Lot Development Plan
<br /> In March 2006, the Bringhurst family submitted an application similar to that currently before
<br /> the Planning Commission, to amend the NSSP for a five-lot PUD development plan (PUD-53).
<br /> The prior proposal was largely similar to the current proposal, including three lots fronting
<br /> Sycamore Creek Way, and two lots on Sycamore Road. Also included in the proposal was a
<br /> request to realign the multi-use trail identified in the NSSP, which was brought to the Trails Ad
<br /> Hoc Subcommittee and Park and Recreation Commission for consideration in 2006. The
<br /> Planning Commission considered and provided input on the proposed PUD plan at a 2008
<br /> work session.
<br /> Trail Realignment— Review by Trails Subcommittee and Park and Recreation Commission
<br /> PUD-53 included a proposed realignment that was consistent with that conceptually approved
<br /> as part of PUD 97-21 (see above), intended to avoid having the trail run along the back of the
<br /> proposed new private lots. Instead the trail would follow Dale Way to Sycamore Road/Minnie
<br /> Street, where it would turn and head east along Sycamore Road/Minnie Street to eventually
<br /> connect to the Happy Valley Loop Trail along Alisal Street (see Figure 5). In September 2006,
<br /> the City's Trails Ad Hoc Committee considered the proposed trail realignment. The Committee
<br /> supported the proposed realignment, with the outcome of the Committee's discussion then
<br /> reported to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The Commission did not take a formal vote
<br /> on the proposal, but no significant questions or objections were raised.
<br /> Figure 5: NSSP Approved and Proposed Multi-Use Trail Alignments
<br /> i I—
<br /> " I u .t". . \- '1 C_.__. - . .--�: k�S;L
<br /> . •
<br /> dill!.ilie ! i /1,i 27
<br /> T19.„,..-11% ° '"� if```ilk Ib{Illi�y, : t J %_:i/ff a/
<br /> a v 4 .l i � . :ii 1 j 1+.26 1 �/ ,o - ( • iatl4,gl %. ,rr- ;r, / i y' r�'�. NSSP Approved Multi- a ' - �.,�lilv-.�J� ' t1, � L_
<br /> --- J Use Trail Alignment It" '' t ' ,./.44,1,,„,„,
<br /> 4'1�� ,j' f f '' _1.-„4,
<br /> �✓ �'+/ J —'�1it:tial. t �0'i i�.�
<br /> J f/�f�J��vy+7
<br /> ^�. ! 1 Y f r I ,i�. _ _
<br /> ).......}4-, -----I-7_,.
<br /> iii,,,,,,0 ,f, ea/,
<br /> _----- fV3
<br /> i •-...,.........i f -'17 i
<br /> ' +�` �� � Proposed Trail —1 ,
<br /> r 1 Alignment ,
<br /> trrr
<br /> .lopes generally "*- '�'"— - - . _ — __ ` , __�_—
<br /> r
<br /> .hove 10 percent. -'f . f /4-,`�. / �� ``-..
<br /> PUD-53 - March 2008 Planning Commission Work Session
<br /> In March 2008 the Planning Commission held a preliminary work session on the proposed
<br /> PUD. (See Exhibit C for the prior Planning Commission staff report and minutes.)
<br /> The Planning Commission questioned and was concerned about the City's prior decision to
<br /> allow site grading and stubbing of utilities prior to receiving project approvals, and that more
<br /> utility laterals had been allowed than the number of residential lots/homes permitted by the
<br /> NSSP. Although no formal vote was taken, in discussion, the majority of the Commission was
<br /> supportive of the potential NSSP amendment and allowing some additional development on
<br /> P18-0075, 990 Sycamore Road Planning Commission
<br /> 6 of 16
<br />be recommended for approval,
<br /> subject to the necessary conditions of approval.
<br /> PUD-135, P19-0030, P19-0031 and Vesting Tentative Map 8528 Planning Commission
<br /> 990 Sycamore Road
<br /> 21 of 23
<br /> .+� s1.
<br /> i� 'Y a 0421 0 0 �I ,�� r •u"' - 36.
<br /> ,`a yy�� n2+a /'�. oM 'le' k� W, k
<br /> 3S 94 '@ g 'via
<br /> R T3
<br /> 1:5,300
<br /> 0 0.05 0.1 mi PUD-89-06-08M, Gabriela Marks, 4210 Rosewood Drive Planning Division _
<br /> January 7 2020 `( �� ""���
<br /> 0 330 660 Feet I Y
<br /> I , I I
<br />
|