My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2020
>
01-15
>
2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2020 12:17:00 PM
Creation date
1/8/2020 12:08:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/15/2020
Document Relationships
2_Exhibit B - Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\01-15
2_Exhibits A & C
(Attachment)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2020 - PRESENT\2020\01-15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> This project was programmatically reviewed as part of the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific <br /> Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which was certified on June 1, 1999. Pursuant to <br /> Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no additional <br /> environmental review is required for residential projects that are proposed in accordance with a <br /> Specific Plan for which CEQA documentation was certified after January 1, 1980. Therefore, <br /> no environmental review document accompanies this report. <br /> SUMMARY/CONCLUSION <br /> Staff has reviewed the subject proposal in accordance with the approved PUD-54 and the <br /> architectural design guidelines for the Estates on Oak Ridge Subdivision and believes the <br /> subject proposal is consistent with the regulations and would meet all of the applicable design <br /> review criteria. Staff believes that the architectural style and design of the residence are <br /> appropriate for the Vineyard Avenue Specific Plan Area. <br /> Primary Author: <br /> Eric Luchini, Associate Planner, 925-931-5612 or eluchini a(�,cityofpleasantonca.gov <br /> Reviewed/Approved By: <br /> Steve Otto, Senior Planner <br /> Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager <br /> Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development <br /> P19-0390, 4 Winding Oaks Drive Planning Commission <br /> 10 of 10 <br />condition of <br /> approval requiring the applicant to revise the lighting plan to remove all landscaping <br /> up-lighting. The recommended condition of approval requires the applicant to submit details for <br /> all building-mounted lighting which is required to complement the intended architectural style of <br /> the proposed residence and be consistent with the architectural design guidelines. <br /> DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA <br /> The Pleasanton Municipal Code Section 18.20 sets forth the criteria to be addressed in <br /> reviewing a Design Review application. These criteria are set forth in the draft Resolution <br /> included as Exhibit A, and includes preservation of natural beauty, relationship of the <br /> residence with the streetscape and surroundings, compatibility of architecture, among other <br /> criteria. Based on the project's conformance with the subdivision's architectural guidelines as <br /> outlined above, staff also finds the proposed home would be consistent with each of the <br /> applicable design review criteria. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> The subject parcel is a legally created lot zoned for residential uses. The proposed residence <br /> complies with the regulations and guidelines of the Estates on Oak Ridge subdivision. While <br /> the proposed project complies with the applicable regulations and guidelines for this site, an <br /> alternative option could be to approve the project with a modified house design, height, size, <br /> etc. if the Planning Commission does not believe the proposed house design, height, size, etc. <br /> are appropriate for this site. The proposed project represents a reasonable development <br /> scenario for the site and as such, staff does not recommend the alternative. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS <br /> Notices of this application were sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a <br /> 1,000-foot radius of the site. Staff has provided the location and noticing map as Exhibit C for <br /> reference. At the time this report was published, staff had not received any public comments <br /> about the project. <br /> P19-0390, 4 Winding Oaks Drive Planning Commission <br /> 9 of 10 <br /> Planning Commission <br /> 6 of 10 <br />