|
Resolution No. PC-2019-24
<br /> Page Two
<br /> NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
<br /> of Pleasanton, based on the entire record of proceedings, including the oral and written
<br /> staff reports and all public comment and testimony:
<br /> Section 1: Denies the appeal of Niraj and Harsha Gandhi and upholds the Zoning
<br /> Administrator's approval of Case No. P19-0130, subject to the conditions shown in
<br /> Exhibit A, attached hereto and made part of this case by reference.
<br /> Section 2: This resolution shall become effective 15 days after its passage and
<br /> adoption unless appealed prior to that time.
<br /> PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of
<br /> Pleasanton at a regular meeting help on November 13, 2019, by the following vote:
<br /> Ayes: Commissioners
<br /> Noes: Commissioners
<br /> Absent: Commissioners
<br /> Abstain: Commissioners
<br /> ATTEST:
<br /> Ellen Clark Nancy Allen
<br /> Secretary, Planning Commission Chair
<br /> APPROVED AS TO FORM:
<br /> Julie Harryman
<br /> Assistant City Attorney
<br />C Chapter 8.20; and
<br /> WHEREAS, after public notice of the proposed project was sent, Niraj Gandhi,
<br /> resident at 7228 Moss Tree Way, reviewed the proposed plans on May 28, 2019, and
<br /> on June 3, 2019 requested a hearing on the proposal; and
<br /> WHEREAS, on July 25, 2019, the Zoning Administrator held a Zoning
<br /> Administrator's hearing and considered relevant exhibits, received testimony from
<br /> interested parties, continued the hearing, and advised the design be revised to respond
<br /> to concerns raised at the hearing; and
<br /> WHEREAS, on October 4, 2019, the Zoning Administrator held the continued
<br /> hearing and considered the revised exhibits, recommendations of staff concerning this
<br /> application, and received testimony from interested parties; and
<br /> WHEREAS, on October 4, 2019 the Zoning Administrator approved the revised
<br /> Administrative Design Review application subject to conditions of approval; and
<br /> WHEREAS, on October 21, 2019, a timely appeal of the Zoning Administrator's
<br /> approval was filed by Niraj and Harsha Gandhi; and
<br /> WHEREAS, on November 13, 2019, the Planning Commission held a duly-
<br /> noticed public hearing and considered relevant exhibits, recommendations of the City
<br /> staff concerning this appeal, and received testimony from interested parties; and
<br /> WHEREAS, this project is categorically exempt (Section 15301 , Class 1 , Existing
<br /> Facilities) from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
<br />ed By:
<br /> Melinda Denis, Permit Center Manager/interim Current Planning Manager
<br /> Julie Harryman, Assistant City Attorney
<br /> Brian Dolan, Assistant City Manager/Acting Director of Community Development
<br /> P19-0130 Planning Commission
<br /> 15 of 15
<br />ength of the garage wall. Based on comments, it was modified to include a
<br /> As previously noted,the project site is located in a PUD district where the underlying PUD requires a side-yard setback of
<br /> 10 feet(one side)and 20 feet(combined).The existing home,as constructed, is set back 15 feet from the west property line
<br /> at its closest point,a larger setback than the standards would require. The proposed addition would be built directly above the
<br /> existing garage and would maintain the existing building setback.
<br /> P19-0130 Planning Commission
<br /> 11 of 15
<br />
|