Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 6: Proposed Elevations <br /> *km-.•. <br /> ABIEB <br /> - in ,� <br /> 0000aoao - oa0000ao <br /> Front(north) Elevation Side(west) Elevation <br /> =-.■, EN <br /> III <br /> • <br /> Rear(south) Elevation <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> Legal Overview <br /> The California legislature has long encouraged accessory dwelling units as a way to address a <br /> variety of housing needs and for providing affordable housing options for family members, <br /> students, the elderly, in-home health care providers, and others. In 2017, the legislature <br /> adopted several new bills to further streamline approvals of ADUs and to limit local <br /> governments' ability to restrict the ability of homeowners to create ADUs. While local <br /> governments are prohibited from precluding ADUs, the legislature did allow for limited design <br /> review, e.g., consideration of height, setbacks, lot coverage, the maximum size of a unit, and <br /> standards that would prevent adverse impacts of any real property listed in the California <br /> Register of Historic Places. Chapter 18.106 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code outlines what <br /> standards may be applied to ADUs and specifies that ADUs are subject to the City's design <br /> review procedures as set forth in PMC Chapter 18.20. In conducting design review of ADUs, <br /> therefore, the City must consider the overriding objectives of State law to facilitate, and not <br /> preclude ADUs. In other words, it would be problematic if the outcome of the design review <br /> process were to effectively deny or preclude construction of an ADU that was otherwise <br /> conforming to the applicable development standards. <br /> Here, the design review process applies because the proposed ADU is over ten feet in height. <br /> The Zoning Administrator typically reviews and approves Design Review applications, with an <br /> appeal of the Zoning Administrator's decision referred to the Planning Commission for <br /> consideration. <br /> P19-0130 Planning Commission <br /> 8 of 15 <br />sion. Minutes of the Zoning <br /> Administrator's hearings are attached as Exhibit D. <br /> SITE AND AREA DESCRIPTION <br /> The subject property is in the Pheasant Ridge development, located south of Bernal Avenue, <br /> between Bernal Park and 1-680. The existing residential neighborhood has a mix of one and <br /> two-story homes. Please refer to Figure 1 for the project location and surroundings. <br /> P19-0130 Planning Commission <br /> 2 of 15 <br />ing a speaker card for that item. <br /> 1. Approve the meeting minutes of October 23, 2019 <br /> MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC <br /> 2. Public Comment from the audience regarding items not listed on the agenda — Speakers are <br /> encouraged to limit comments to 3 minutes. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 3. P19-0130, Niraj and Harsha Gandhi, Appellants; Nadia & Fayyaz Malik, Applicants —Appeal <br /> of the Zoning Administrator's approval of an Administrative Design Review for the construction of <br /> an approximately 480-square-foot second story addition and exterior stairway (to accommodate an <br /> accessory dwelling unit) at the existing two-story residence at 7218 Moss Tree Way. Zoning for <br />e existing two-story residence at 7218 Moss Tree Way. Zoning for <br />