My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
110519
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2019 3:40:34 PM
Creation date
11/1/2019 1:52:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/5/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
18 ATTACHMENTS
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\110519
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
With regulatory trends growing more stringent relating to PFOA and PFOS, there is <br /> concern about the long-term feasibility of Well 5, 6, and 8 continuing to be a viable <br /> source of water. Even if at a regional water supply level it is determined that <br /> additional water from Zone 7 is available to offset that lost from Well 5, 6, and 8, the <br /> City's distribution system needs to be analyzed to determine if any infrastructure <br /> improvements are required to distribute that water from different source locations. <br /> Staff recommends that this analysis be included with the upcoming water capacity <br /> evaluation efforts by the City. <br /> The City last completed a water capacity evaluation of its system in 2004. Therefore, <br /> as part of the CIP FY19/20, staff included a budget of$400,000 to complete a new <br /> study which will include the use of a consultant. When establishing the budget, staff <br /> did not include performing these PFOA and PFOS alternative impact runs. Additional <br /> funding may be required but will be determined during the consultant selection <br /> process. Staff estimates the overall schedule for the evaluation to be two years. <br /> However, it is estimated that the hydraulic model and initial analysis under existing <br /> conditions to determine the impacts of loss of Wells 5, 6, and 8 can be expedited to <br /> be completed within approximately one year. <br /> 3. Incorporate potential financial impacts of PFOA and PFOS regulations into Water <br /> Rate Study. <br /> The O&M cost to currently supply water from the City's groundwater supply is <br /> significantly lower than the cost to purchase water from Zone 7. Therefore, whether <br /> the solution to address future PFOA and PFOS regulations is through added <br /> treatment at Well 5, 6, and 8, or by offsetting the use of those wells with Zone 7 <br /> water, an increase to the City's water operating expenses will be realized. In <br /> addition, capital improvements to varying extents will be required for both solutions. <br /> Staff is currently in the beginning phases of the 2020 Water and Sewer Rate Study. <br /> It is recommended that the impact of PFOA and PFOS regulations be included in the <br /> study. The Water and Sewer Operational Funds have budgeted $120,000 during <br /> FY19/20 and the study is scheduled to be completed by April 2020. <br /> 4. Increase resources for legislative tracking both for future Response Level changes <br /> and establishment of MCLs <br /> To date, the regulatory changes related to PFOA and PFOS have been quick, have <br /> not always followed traditional water quality regulatory framework, and have had <br /> major operational consequences. Increasing legislative tracking resources will allow <br /> the City to stay more informed on the specifics of what regulations are being <br /> considered to potentially have influence over those regulations (particularly in the <br /> review of the scientific establishment of Response Levels, PHGs and the <br /> establishment of technologically and economically feasible MCLs), and to be better <br /> prepared when those regulations are put in place. Staff will be working with <br /> legislative consultant Townsend and Associates, as well as becoming members of <br /> the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) and California Association of <br /> Sanitation Agencies (CASA) to implement this recommendation. <br /> Page 12 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.