My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
110519
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2019 3:40:34 PM
Creation date
11/1/2019 1:52:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/5/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
18 ATTACHMENTS
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\110519
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o Response Level compliance <br /> o Notification Level compliance <br /> o Below detection limits <br /> • Treatment technology evaluations including: <br /> o Blending <br /> o Granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption <br /> o Ion exchange (IX) resin treatment <br /> o Reverse osmosis treatment <br /> • Alternatives comparisons that includes <br /> o Determination of required facility upgrades to support <br /> o Construction feasibility <br /> o Residual management strategies <br /> o Operational staffing impacts and certification needs <br /> o Capital costs and O&M costs <br /> o Pros and cons comparison <br /> • Implementation plan in coordination with City to implement recommended full- <br /> scale treatment systems. <br /> The estimated schedule for completion of the feasibility study is February 2020. The <br /> fee for the feasibility study is $200,000, which will require allocation from the Water <br /> Fund into CIP 17100 to cover these additional expenses. <br /> If the City elected to proceed with implementation of PFAS treatment, the design and <br /> construction implementation schedule is estimated to be a minimum of 18 months <br /> and could be longer due to other factors such as permitting, and availability of <br /> materials. The design and construction costs are unknown at this time and will be <br /> estimated during the feasibility study. Currently, the CIP has budgeted <br /> improvements of $1.5 million for Well 8 in FY 21/22 and $1 .5 million for Well 5 and 6 <br /> in FY 22/23. However, these estimates were primarily based on extending the useful <br /> life of the facility and improving disinfection systems. PFAS treatment facilities will <br /> likely exceed these budgets and require additional engineering resources to manage <br /> the design and construction of the project. <br /> 2. Perform Water Capacity Evaluation and include analysis of impact to City's water <br /> distribution system when utilizing alternative water supplies to Wells 5, 6, and 8. <br /> A water capacity evaluation builds a hydraulic model of the water distribution system <br /> to evaluate its ability to properly deliver water (i.e. at adequate pressures) to meet <br /> demands during average, peak, and emergency conditions. Water capacity <br /> evaluations require significant coordination with the Community Development <br /> Department to define buildout service area characteristics and potential water users, <br /> the Water Resources Section to define future water demands, Utilities Division to <br /> understand operational strategies to maintain water quality on a day to day basis, <br /> and Zone 7 to determine flow and pressure capacities at City turnouts. The outcome <br /> of the evaluation would be a list of recommended capacity-related improvements <br /> such as pumping, storage, and piping capacity improvements to be able to properly <br /> meet future demands. <br /> Page 11 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.