My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
HUMAN SERVICES
>
2019
>
110619
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 12:48:35 PM
Creation date
10/29/2019 3:04:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/6/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• comparisons to Commission Alternates and Youth members and them being able to - <br />vote <br />• the requirement to fully understand what is required of the Human Services Commission <br />with the grant process and understanding the work of the agencies requesting grants, <br />which sometimes can require several years. of gathering knowledge <br />• future discussion needed especially regarding -allocation of grant funds <br />Ms. Thomas advised Commissioners Costanzo and Prakash were gathering information and <br />the recommendation could be taken back to the Youth Commission and amended. She also <br />advised that the Youth Commission has the responsibility of reviewing and recommending <br />allocation of grant funds, and some of the same agencies request funds from the Youth_ <br />Commission. <br />Commissioners Clare, Hayes and Sedlak indicated they had concerns with recommending the <br />youth members -of the Human Services Commission be provided the opportunity to vote <br />without further discussion pertaining to the grant allocation process. <br />Commissioner Rubino Brumm indicated she understood the concerns of the other <br />commissions but allowing the youth member to vote was not a concern to her. Commissioner: <br />Powers agreed and felt it was important to receive input from youth members. <br />Commissioner Clare stated that the funding allocation was not her main concern, it was the <br />amount of time required for any commissioner to fully understand the work of the.many <br />agencies. She.questioned whether each. commission receiving this presentation would be <br />allowed to respond separately and felt that youth members on the Human Services. <br />Commission needed more time to fully understand the working of the commission. <br />Commissioner Hayes agreed. She, felt having a voting member on the Library Commission <br />would make sense because of what is currently taking place regarding the possibility of a new <br />library. Commissioners Hayes felt it was important to. receive input fromyouthon this issue. <br />Chairperson Parikh opened the meeting for public comment. There was none so the. <br />meeting was closed for public comment. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Rubino Brumm, seconded. by Commissioner Powers, <br />recommending support for a- Municipal Code Amendment allowing youth members to vote on <br />the Civic Arts, Human Services, Library and. Parks and Recreation Commissions. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES Commissioners Powers and Rubino Brumm, <br />NOES: Commissioners Carlucci, Clare, Hayes, Sedlak and Chairperson Parikh <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Gohil <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Ms.. Thomas advised Commissioner Hayes that the. proposed Pilot Program pertained only to <br />the quorum requirement. <br />Human Services Commission <br />October 2, 2019 <br />Page 3 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.