My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
HUMAN SERVICES
>
2019
>
110619
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 12:48:35 PM
Creation date
10/29/2019 3:04:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/6/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MATTERS BEFORE THE COMMISSION <br />4. Consider Support for a Municipal Code Amendment Allowing Youth Members to <br />Vote on the Civic Arts, Human Services, Library, and Parks and Recreation <br />Commissions <br />Ms. Thomas noted that at the February 13, 2019 meeting of the Youth Commission a motion <br />was made requesting that its Public Policy Subcommittee review and consider changes to the <br />voting policy so that youth members on the.Civic Arts, Human Services, Library, and Parks <br />and Recreation Commissions be provided the ability to vote. Additionally, at the May 8, 2019 <br />meeting the Youth Commission received a presentation from the Public Policy Subcommittee <br />and a motion was made with a recommendation to City Council that the youth members on <br />these other commissions be allowed to vote. <br />Ms. Thomas also noted that the Youth Commission was recommending a one-year pilot <br />program be put in place to retain the existing quorum requirement that would allow the Civic <br />Arts, Human Services, Library, and Parks and Recreation Commissions sufficient time to <br />evaluate quorum effectiveness before any Municipal Code quorum changes be recommended. <br />Ms. Thomas introduced Commissioners Kristina Costanzo and Tejas Prakash, members of the <br />Youth Commission Public Policy Subcommittee and advised they would provide a PowerPoint. <br />presentation outlining surveys and research they have conducted in providing this <br />recommendation for amending the Municipal Code. <br />Commissioners. Costanzo and Prakash provided information pertaining to: <br />• responses received from surveys conducted with Youth Commissions of other cities <br />noting that none of these cities have youth representatives participating on other <br />commissions <br />• responses received from a student survey conducted and responses received from a <br />survey conducted of City of Pleasanton staff members <br />• responses received in support of allowing youth members of other commissions the <br />right to vote <br />• negative responses stating youth should be 18 -years of age to be allowed to .vote <br />• survey results as shown on a graph <br />• the importance of youth members being allowed to provide input and vote on issues <br />Comments and questions received from members of the Human Services Commission <br />included, <br />• additional information regarding the graph results <br />• whether survey was conducted only with staff members or also with other cities <br />• Pleasanton being ahead of the curve in having youth members on other commissions <br />• are there other ways that youth could be heard and engaged? <br />• does the Youth Commission have a rebuttal to statements regarding needing to be 18 - <br />years of age to vote <br />Human Services Commission <br />October 2, 2019 <br />Paget . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.