Laserfiche WebLink
matter of two or three feet. So I think we ought to expect decent landscaping especially if <br /> parking stays in front so there's a little bit of a buffer. <br /> Commissioner Nagler: So just could I say, to be fair to the applicant, the small setback is a <br /> response to staff's desire that some of it be on Owens. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor: When we've got a lot of trees in, I'm coming from personal <br /> experience, you've got to be careful with trees and where they go because you can get trees <br /> that are perfectly sized to block all of your tenants' signage and that's exactly what an owner of <br /> a retail establishment does not want. <br /> Commissioner Allen: That's a good point. So we've got a balancing act here. Let me just <br /> ask—do you agree or do you not agree that it would be nice to have a little more landscaping, <br /> and I'm specifically talking about....assuming we have parking in front. That's the main area <br /> because right now if you look at the spot, there's actually bushes. There's grass and there's <br /> bushes so you actually don't see the front of the cars at the Denny's lot as much. <br /> Commissioner Balch: My only comment to that is, I would want it so that someone walking on <br /> the sidewalk can get into there safely. From where those points are and how they denote <br /> them I don't.... <br /> Commissioner Allen: It's this here which is pretty sparse. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor: As long as it's not so tall you can't see through. <br /> Chair Ritter: It's got to be an inviting lot without blocking. <br /> Commissioner Allen: Exactly. <br /> Chair Ritter: I'm also in favor. I think if we can't move the buildings forward to get the drive- <br /> thru up to 12 or 13 spaces for the queueing line, I'm okay with removing the tree and not <br /> charging. I think the queueing line is the key. <br /> D. Does the Planning Commission support the proposed uses? <br /> Commissioner Balch: I do not. Here's why and Galen mentioned that they hadn't necessarily <br /> examined it so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt on that. But given the proposed current <br /> zoning that's C-F and you look at the C-C circled, and again, I understand that they're <br /> restricted so they may add some additional as they kind of flow through the process. There's <br /> barely a throw of C-F uses on the C-C's they circled. In fact, it's a little hard because the C-F <br /> zoning is for like a boat lot and you know, a large retail camping store and all the things that <br /> draw people off of the freeway and into their lot which this particular lot will not have an auto <br /> dealership type of thing that will draw people off of the freeway. But, when I looked at the <br /> permitted uses circled and the uses not circled, I think they have some work to do to determine <br /> exactly what they're going to allow on the lot. You know, it is a lot of restaurant and retail. The <br /> retail is like nails, hair, things like that circled, and you kind of get the idea that bars are out and <br /> things like that. But, generally my comment is that you're a C-F straight up zoning, you're <br /> circled or permitted items requested on your PUD there's not one from the C-F that comes <br /> over. So it's truly a new zoning with a PUD element and I question that and question how far <br /> Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, September 28, 2016 Page 17 of 20 <br /> <br />e okay with no B. I just want to say as a principle because of <br /> the need to easily access the parking I don't actually have a problem with the B lot being in the <br /> front. <br /> Commissioner Brown: Put simply it seems like if the desire to have the drive-thru doesn't fit in <br /> a design if after 20 iterations that it isn't a perfect for the property. I don't know how else to put <br /> it, whether its 11 or 12 and I'm not even trying to design it because I'm sure after 20 iterations <br /> Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, September 28, 2016 Page 14 of 20 <br />ally <br /> can't take another 20 feet for that 12th car out of the depth of Building B because then we're <br /> looking at a building's that probably 20 feet deep or we have to severely carve into the corner <br /> Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, September 28, 2016 Page 9 of 20 <br />ructural control such as an oil/water separator or sand filter. No other area shall <br /> P16-1349 and PUD-121 Planning Commission <br /> Page 11 of 19 <br />