Laserfiche WebLink
THE CITY OF Planning Commission <br /> —,— <br /> Agenda Report <br /> Egg . _. III : ui .... <br /> LEASANTON© September 25, 2019 <br /> Item 3 <br /> SUBJECT: P16-1349 and PUD-121 <br /> APPLICANT/ <br /> PROPERTY OWNER: Abbas Mash <br /> PURPOSE: Applications for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezoning and <br /> Development Plan to: (1) demolish the existing approximately <br /> 3,510-square-foot restaurant building; (2) rezone the subject parcel <br /> from C-F (Freeway Commercial) District to PUD-C (Planned Unit <br /> Development— Commercial) District; and (3) construct an <br /> approximately 10,980-square-foot, single-story, multi-tenant <br /> commercial building and related site improvements <br /> LOCATION: 6455 Owens Drive <br /> GENERAL PLAN: Retail, Highway, and Service Commercial; Business and <br /> Professional Offices <br /> ZONING: C-F (Freeway Commercial) District <br /> EXHIBITS: A. Draft Resolution and Conditions of Approval <br /> B. Project Plans dated "Received August 27, 2019" <br /> C. Proposed List of Uses dated "Received August 27, 2019" <br /> D. Minute Excerpt of the September 28, 2016, Planning <br /> Commission Work Session <br /> E. Arborist Report dated "August 18, 2016" <br /> F. Location and Notification Map <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends the Planning Commission: <br /> 1. Find that the proposed PUD rezoning (P16-1349) and PUD Development Plan (PUD-121) <br /> are consistent with the General Plan and the purposes of the PUD Ordinance; <br /> 2. Adopt a resolution recommending approval of P16-1349 and PUD-121, subject to the <br /> required findings and draft conditions of approval listed in Exhibit A; and <br /> 3. Forward the applications to the City Council for consideration. <br />tings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) <br /> There were no reports from meetings attended. <br /> 6. Future Planning Calendar <br /> Ms. Clark gave a brief overview of future items for the Commission's review. <br /> 7. Actions of the City Council <br /> No action was taken. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 15 of 16 August 28, 2019 <br />the motion. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 14 of 16 August 28, 2019 <br />property line. It is from the pad-level of the 7-Eleven and he was willing to go to a total of <br /> six feet and the church level will be lower from the pad level. <br /> Commissioner Brown clarified that the recommendation is six feet in total including the height <br /> of the retaining wall as measured from the pad level of the 7-Eleven. <br /> All Commissioners concurred. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 13 of 16 August 28, 2019 <br />ght iron fence continuance to the <br /> sidewalk or closer to it. <br /> Mr. Hirst replied that staff had indicated they want an open area. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 12 of 16 August 28, 2019 <br />r. Schafer spoke in regard to the grade changes of the retaining wall on the site and said the <br /> 18-inches will continue to the back or southwest corner and around the other side. Heading <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 11 of 16 August 28, 2019 <br />y changed the three-foot <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 16 August 28, 2019 <br />019 <br /> adjacent neighbors, with the exception of the homes on Rachael Place, which are set back a <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 16 August 28, 2019 <br />