My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
3_Exhibits A & C-F
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
09-25
>
3_Exhibits A & C-F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2019 11:36:05 AM
Creation date
9/18/2019 11:35:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2019
Document Relationships
3
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\09-25
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor: It happens everywhere. Where's one in Pleasanton? We have one <br /> at McDonalds at Bernal and....it does the same thing. They do it all over the place. <br /> Commissioner Balch: Well, you can take it up with Starbucks. <br /> Grant: We did try it and we thought that that would be a solution. <br /> Commissioner Brown: So Herb, can I ask a question I asked Eric? What was the reason for <br /> the additional restricted uses above what C-C normally provides? <br /> Grant: To be honest with you, we didn't intend to be that restrictive so I think we just made an <br /> error in what we're asking for, but we're not trying to be that restrictive. <br /> Commissioner Nagler: So may I ask a question? Getting Starbucks to want to be a tenant was <br /> a big accomplishment, right? What is your suspicion about what the occupants will be in the <br /> other spaces? In other words, how has it been in your outreach to attempt to get other <br /> occupants in the other spaces? <br /> Commissioner Balch: What other uses do you see? <br /> Grant: Retail and restaurants, so still very generic. <br /> Commissioner Nagler: Okay. <br /> Chair Ritter: Okay thank you. We have one more speaker card. Do you want to say any <br /> comments? No? <br /> Grant: I think we've covered everything. Thank you. <br /> Chair Ritter: Thank you. We'll close the public comment. We're going to take a quick five <br /> minute break. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> The Planning Commission took a break at 9:42 p.m. and thereafter reconvened the regular <br /> meeting at 9:49 p.m. <br /> Chair Ritter: Okay, let's put up the questions on the screen and we'll be able to start. Granted <br /> this is a workshop. We're all just creating ideas and sharing ideas, so let's just kind of go <br /> through these and if you hear the answer already said, you can just say "good" and move to <br /> the next one. <br /> DISCUSSION POINTS <br /> A. Does the Commission support the proposed site layout and building orientation <br /> including the proposed drive-through and associated queueing capacity? <br /> Commissioner Allen: I don't know enough to answer. I sure don't support the queueing <br /> capacity. I mean, as Galen said, it's not good practice to have dead end parking for his project <br /> from his perspective. Well, as a City representative it's not good practice for us to design a <br /> Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, September 28, 2016 Page 13 of 20 <br />site, but in <br /> reality, it's really entering that drive at the tangent point and that car can go right or left. <br /> Commissioner Nagler: And just to be clear, my question specifically is an attempt to length the <br /> queue. That's what it was. <br /> Grant: I understand. <br /> Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, September 28, 2016 Page 11 of 20 <br /> 38 feet and we agreed to do that because we needed <br /> to come much closer to that 12 car queueing requirement. I had a discussion today with Adam <br /> about the agreement that I felt that we had as a result of one of the recent meetings where we <br /> had the 10 cars and the traffic report said 12 cars, and it was our understanding that if we <br /> could get one more car—if we could get to the 11th car—than that would be an acceptable <br /> solution because it's not a perfect size. It could be 13, it could be 12, it could be 11. We were <br /> at 10 and we were able to modify the site plan. It took a lot of effort to manipulate all of the <br /> different pieces and make sure we were satisfying the accessibility requirements and the <br /> distribution. At one time we had the two handicapped cars for accessible parking spaces <br /> located in front of Building A, but the request was made, can you get one car related to each <br /> building, and so we were able to do that. <br /> So, we're very hopeful because you know we're kind of up against the wall. That 12th car; the <br /> comment was made well, can we make Building B shallower. Well, we really can't. We really <br /> can't take another 20 feet for that 12th car out of the depth of Building B because then we're <br /> looking at a building's that probably 20 feet deep or we have to severely carve into the corner <br /> Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, September 28, 2016 Page 9 of 20 <br />ructural control such as an oil/water separator or sand filter. No other area shall <br /> P16-1349 and PUD-121 Planning Commission <br /> Page 11 of 19 <br />