3 - Laserfiche WebLink

ANALYSIS General Plan Consistency The project site has a General Plan Land Use designation of"Retail/Highway/Service Commercial; Business and Professional Offices." The proposed project conforms to the General Plan land use designation and with the following General Plan policies and programs: Sustainability Program 2.2: Encourage the reuse of vacant and underutilized parcels and buildings within existing urban areas. Industrial, Commercial and Office Policy 13: Ensure that neighborhood, community, and regional commercial centers provide goods and services needed by residents and businesses of Pleasanton and its market area. Program 13.1: Zone sufficient land for neighborhood, community, and regional commercial uses to support Pleasanton's increasing business activity. Policy 14: Provide adequate neighborhood commercial acreage to serve the future needs of each neighborhood at buildout. Program 14.1: Locate appropriately-scaled commercial centers with reasonable access to the residential neighborhoods they serve. In addition, the proposed project with a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 30.73% is below the maximum 60% FAR and the 35% average density FAR allowed for commercial land uses by the General Plan. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. PUD Rezoning and Uses The subject parcel is zoned C-F District. The proposal seeks to rezone the property to PUD-C, which would: 1) allow for a customized list of permitted and conditionally permitted commercial uses on the subject parcel (Exhibit C); and 2) provide flexibility and/or relief from the prescribed development standards of the C-F District. The proposed commercial uses comprise uses currently allowed by both the C-F and C-C Districts and include uses such as restaurants, personal services, offices, financial institutions, bars and brew pubs, gyms and health clubs, liquor stores, and tutoring facilities. The proposed uses list was based on the applicant's desired uses for the project in conjunction with staff's guidance. Staff has evaluated the proposed project against the prescribed development standards of the C-F District in Table 1. P16-1349 and PUD-121, 6455 Owens Drive Planning Commission 11 of 15 i" ' j j •'!5C.5 GhIVE`H.5 P48.55{.15-ACF{ 15 SALLON 14 AA I5 Iir 4_*__ -AGM.STROEMIA IND GA'NATC.I-Er GRAPE MYRZE 15 GALLON 0 LOA -i i ,UNCUS ATS GRAY RLSF 16ALLGN 279 Los 11111 LNCOP-1, LAND P.M -ERAS RANTj5R 5 6.4LON lb LOA _ -OODONA_A V15COSA PURPUREA- P.RP_E 40.SEEP S GALLON 5 Lan .� I., 4140_ _ -DE`ES I :M IOID=S FORTY T L.L" 5 6ALLO01'1A 78 Ls t LORAL-EA 3ARBARA -LEA 5ALL_OV LO0W Uki1O G AABLL C TElR5 LCO5Y11SOARL &",MR ' 4115GL_O506OW --.•RHAPi OLEP5.1C^_A-A 14 NOR. "ADO-IAA-HORN `GAL-OM 45 LOW • � - LANTANA'GhRI5TINE' P-RI5T14E_ANTANA SAL-ON 45 LOW . ............... {0101/8 SOLONA GGO00 GLLO4 Q- .. ..F10 .4 :&LA EARS- GBOR.AVVD1FIG 5 5 5N10O _ S LGWW BIO RLEATTIOH A-C SA .al w , .-- 3 '*. ,. b f , ,y;` ,'� r .1, L1/4 ?J....4 / arJ- ..,,,N.4,--,f', ^a 'u` ^ ^. + ' (/Ar. ,1h L. ..Ltt,,.w. b b0'j � f�i� �� (f y r A. � R .��.' 1 R r, Ns DR *_- { P16-1349 and PUD-121, 6455 Owens Drive Planning Commission 10 of 15