Laserfiche WebLink
received three emails related to the project included in Attachment 5. All <br />correspondence received prior to the Planning Commission hearing is included in <br />Attachment 3, Exhibit D. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />This project is categorically exempt (Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities) from the <br />requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, no <br />environmental document accompanies this report. <br />SUMMARY/CONCLUSION <br />As proposed and conditioned, the Planning Commission found that the proposed use <br />would be compatible with, and would not detrimentally affect, the existing or future <br />adjacent/nearby uses or residences, and that the proposed use will fulfill a community <br />need and be appropriately located. Conditions of approval have been included which <br />will ensure that the safety and general welfare of the surrounding area, and the City in <br />general, is maintained. Therefore, staff recommends the City Council uphold the <br />Planning Commission's approval of the project, as conditioned. <br />Submit ed by: <br />f <br />N(� <br />Brian olan <br />Acting Community <br />Development Director/ <br />Assistant City Manager <br />Fisc I Review: <br />�� <br />Tina Olson <br />Director of Finance <br />Approved y: <br />r'` <br />Nelson Fialho <br />City Manager <br />Attachments: <br />1. Draft Resolution with Exhibit A, Recommended Conditions of Approval upholding <br />the Planning Commission approval of P19-0149 <br />2. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC -2019-18 <br />3. August 14, 2019, Planning Commission Agenda Report with the following <br />exhibits: <br />a. Exhibit B -Project plans dated received "July 19, 2019" <br />b. Exhibit C -Location and Notification Map <br />c. Exhibit D -Public Correspondence <br />4. August 14, 2019, Draft Planning Commission Minute Excerpt <br />5. Public Correspondence <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />