2_Exhibits I-J - Laserfiche WebLink

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Verification Timing of Responsibility for Verification Complete Verification Verification Date Initial use, shall submit a health risk assessment(HRA)to the City of Pleasanton prior to future discretionary project approval.The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk exceeds 10 in one million (I0E-06), PM2.5 concentrations exceed 0.3 pg/m3, or the appropriate noncancer hazard index exceeds 1.0,the applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that mitigation measures are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. Implementation of the AQ-4:Applicants for residential and Submittal of findings Prior to City of Proposed Plan could other sensitive land use projects(e.g., and documentation. discretionary Pleasanton expose sensitive hospitals, nursing homes, day care project Community receptors to stationary centers) in Pleasanton within 1,000 feet approval Development sources of toxic air of a major sources of toxic air Department contaminants. contaminants(TACs) (e.g.,warehouses, industrial areas,and roadways with traffic volumes over 10,000 vehicle per day),as measured from the property line of the project to the property line of the source/edge of the nearest travel lane, shall submit a health risk assessment(HRA)to the City of Pleasanton prior to future discretionary project approval.The HRA shall be 5 roval Development sources of toxic air 40 or more trucks with operating Department contaminants. diesel-powered TRUs,and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g., residential,schools, hospitals, nursing homes), as measured from the property line of a proposed Project to the property line of the nearest sensitive 4 following consists of a monitoring program table noting the responsible entity for mitigation monitoring,the timing,and a list of all project-related mitigation measures. ption of Statement of Overriding Considerations The City Council has weighed the economic,legal,social,technological,and other benefits of the proposed Plan,as set forth above in Section II.D,against the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan identified in the Draft EIR(and discussed above in Section II.A). The City Council hereby determines that those benefits outweigh the risks and adverse environmental impacts of the Plan,and further determines that the Plan's significant unavoidable impacts are acceptable. Accordingly, the City Council adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations, recognizing that significant unavoidable impacts will result from implementation of the Plan.Having(i)adopted all feasible mitigation measures,as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;(ii) rejected alternatives to the Plan, as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;and(iii) recognized the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan, the City Council hereby finds that each of the separate benefits of the proposed Plan, as stated herein, is determined to be unto itself an overriding consideration, independent of other benefits, that warrants approval of the Plan and outweighs and overrides its significant unavoidable impacts,and thereby justifies the approval of the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan. 27 would result in an operational emissions increase of 4,000 MTCO2e per year and an energy consumption increase of 168,000 million BTU per year compared to existing conditions. While the Plan would not be sufficient to align downtown Pleasanton's emissions trajectory with the goals established under SB 32 and EO S-3-05,implementation of the 26 ntal 24 iteria air pollutants 23