2_Exhibits I-J - Laserfiche WebLink

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Verification Timing of Responsibility for Verification Complete Verification Verification Date Initial Operational sources AQ-2: Prior to issuance of Submittal of Prior to Construction under the Proposed Plan construction permit, development documentation. issuance of contractor; would generate project applicants that are subject to construction City of emissions of ROG, PM10, CEQA and exceed the screening sizes in permit Pleasanton and PM25 that exceeds BAAQMD's CEQA Guidelines shall Community BAAQMD's project-level prepare and submit to the City of Development thresholds and Pleasanton a technical assessment Department contribute to the evaluating potential air quality impacts nonattainment related to the project's operation phase. designation of the The evaluation shall be prepared in SFBAAB for 03, PM2s, conformance with the BAAQMD and PMio. methodology in assessing air quality impacts. If operation-related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the BAAQMD thresholds of significance,as identified in BAAQMD's CEQA Guidelines,the City of Pleasanton Community Development Department shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during operational activities. Implementation of the AQ-3:Applicants for future non- Submittal of Prior to City of Proposed Plan could residential land uses within the city that: documentation. discretionary Pleasanton expose sensitive I) have the potential to generate 100 or project Community receptors to mobile more diesel truck trips per day or have approval Development sources of toxic air 40 or more trucks with operating Department contaminants. diesel-powered TRUs,and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g., residential,schools, hospitals, nursing homes), as measured from the property line of a proposed Project to the property line of the nearest sensitive 4 following consists of a monitoring program table noting the responsible entity for mitigation monitoring,the timing,and a list of all project-related mitigation measures. ption of Statement of Overriding Considerations The City Council has weighed the economic,legal,social,technological,and other benefits of the proposed Plan,as set forth above in Section II.D,against the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan identified in the Draft EIR(and discussed above in Section II.A). The City Council hereby determines that those benefits outweigh the risks and adverse environmental impacts of the Plan,and further determines that the Plan's significant unavoidable impacts are acceptable. Accordingly, the City Council adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations, recognizing that significant unavoidable impacts will result from implementation of the Plan.Having(i)adopted all feasible mitigation measures,as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;(ii) rejected alternatives to the Plan, as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;and(iii) recognized the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan, the City Council hereby finds that each of the separate benefits of the proposed Plan, as stated herein, is determined to be unto itself an overriding consideration, independent of other benefits, that warrants approval of the Plan and outweighs and overrides its significant unavoidable impacts,and thereby justifies the approval of the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan. 27 would result in an operational emissions increase of 4,000 MTCO2e per year and an energy consumption increase of 168,000 million BTU per year compared to existing conditions. While the Plan would not be sufficient to align downtown Pleasanton's emissions trajectory with the goals established under SB 32 and EO S-3-05,implementation of the 26 ntal 24 iteria air pollutants 23