2_Exhibits I-J - Laserfiche WebLink

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan 2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Verification Timing of Responsibility for Verification Complete Verification Verification Date Initial Air Quality Construction associated AQ-I: Prior to issuance of Submittal of findings Prior to City of with implementation of construction permit, development and documentation issuance of Pleasanton the Proposed Plan would project applicants that are subject to construction Community create new sources of CEQA and exceed the screening sizes in permit Development fugitive PMio and PM2,s BAAQMD's CEQA Guidelines shall Department dust emissions and ROG prepare and submit to the City of emissions, contributing Pleasanton a technical assessment to the nonattainment evaluating potential project designation of the construction-related air quality impacts. SFBAAB for 03, PM2s, The evaluation shall be prepared in and PMio. conformance with the BAAQMD methodology in assessing air quality impacts. If construction-related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the BAAQMD thresholds of significance,as identified in the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines, the City of Pleasanton shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities to below these thresholds. 3 oval of the Proposed Plan and the methods of monitoring such actions. A monitoring program is necessary only for impacts which would be significant if not mitigated. If,during the course of project implementation,any of the mitigation measures identified cannot be successfully implemented,the City shall immediately inform any affected responsible agencies. The City,in conjunction with any affected responsible agencies,will then determine if modification to the project is required,and/or whether alternative mitigation is appropriate. The following consists of a monitoring program table noting the responsible entity for mitigation monitoring,the timing,and a list of all project-related mitigation measures. ption of Statement of Overriding Considerations The City Council has weighed the economic,legal,social,technological,and other benefits of the proposed Plan,as set forth above in Section II.D,against the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan identified in the Draft EIR(and discussed above in Section II.A). The City Council hereby determines that those benefits outweigh the risks and adverse environmental impacts of the Plan,and further determines that the Plan's significant unavoidable impacts are acceptable. Accordingly, the City Council adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations, recognizing that significant unavoidable impacts will result from implementation of the Plan.Having(i)adopted all feasible mitigation measures,as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;(ii) rejected alternatives to the Plan, as stated herein and discussed in the Draft EIR;and(iii) recognized the significant unavoidable impacts of the Plan, the City Council hereby finds that each of the separate benefits of the proposed Plan, as stated herein, is determined to be unto itself an overriding consideration, independent of other benefits, that warrants approval of the Plan and outweighs and overrides its significant unavoidable impacts,and thereby justifies the approval of the City of Pleasanton Downtown Specific Plan. 27 would result in an operational emissions increase of 4,000 MTCO2e per year and an energy consumption increase of 168,000 million BTU per year compared to existing conditions. While the Plan would not be sufficient to align downtown Pleasanton's emissions trajectory with the goals established under SB 32 and EO S-3-05,implementation of the 26 ntal 24 iteria air pollutants 23