|
The development of the Plan would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels
<br /> above levels existing without the Plan. (Draft EIR,pp.3.10-31 to 3.10-32,Impact 3.10-3.)
<br /> The development of the Plan would not result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
<br /> noise levels above levels existing without the Plan.(Draft EIR,pp.3.10-32 to 3.10-33,Impact 3.10-4.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not expose people residing or working in the planning area to excessive
<br /> noise levels.(Draft EIR,pp.3.10-33,Impact 3.10-5.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive
<br /> noise levels, nor result in a safety hazard for people residing or working within the vicinity of a private
<br /> airstrip.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.10-33,Impact 3.10-6.)
<br /> 11. Public Facilities and Recreation
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
<br /> provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
<br /> governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,in order
<br /> to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection,
<br /> police protection,schools,parks,or other public facilities.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.11-18 to 3.11-22,Impact 3.11-
<br /> 1.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or
<br /> other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
<br /> accelerated.(Draft EIR,pp.3.11-22,Impact 3.11-2.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or
<br /> expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. (Draft
<br /> EIR,pp.3.11-23,Impact 3.11-3.)
<br /> 12. Traffic and Transportation
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not conflict with an applicable congestion management program,
<br /> including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards
<br /> established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways.(Draft EIR,pp.
<br /> 3.12-54,Impact 3.12-2.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either an increase
<br /> in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks.(Draft EIR,pp.3.12-55,Impact
<br /> 3.12-3.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp
<br /> curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). (Draft EIR, pp. 3.12-55,
<br /> Impact 3.12-4.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not result in inadequate emergency access. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.12-55,
<br /> Impact 3.12-5.)
<br /> 13. Utilities and Service Systems
<br /> 10
<br />e-existing nearby wells would drop to a level
<br /> which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted). (Draft
<br /> EIR,pp.3.8-27 to 3.8-28,Impact 3.8-2.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the planning
<br /> area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,in a manner which would result in
<br /> substantial erosion,siltation,or flooding on-or off-site.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.8-28 to 3.8-30,Impact 3.8-3.)
<br /> 8
<br />s a program-level analysis of the environmental impacts of the Plan and supports all levels
<br /> of approval necessary to implement the Plan.
<br /> F. Certification of the Draft and Final EIR
<br /> In accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15090(a)(1), the City Council, as lead agency, finds and
<br /> certifies that the Draft and Final EIR have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA
<br /> 4
<br />d to comply with
<br /> 1
<br />e use shall be at least 300 feet from an R or 0 district.
<br /> Distributed at the May 28,2019, Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting and the June 26,2019 Planning Commission Meeting
<br /> Provided for Reference 54
<br />
|