|
Development under the Plan would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity
<br /> of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted
<br /> runoff.(Draft EIR,pp.3.8-30 to 3.8-32,Impact 3.8-4.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not otherwise substantially degrade water quality. (Draft EIR,pp. 3.8-
<br /> 32 to 3.8-33,Impact 3.8-5.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a
<br /> federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map.(Draft
<br /> EIR,pp.3.8-33,Impact 3.8-6.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would
<br /> impede or redirect flood flows.(Draft EIR,pp.3.8-33,Impact 3.8-7.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury,or
<br /> death involving flooding,including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam.(Draft EIR,pp.3.8-
<br /> 34 to 3.8-35,Impact 3.8-8.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not result in inundation by seiche, tsunami,or mudflow. (Draft EIR,
<br /> pp.3.8-35,Impact 3.8-9.)
<br /> 9. Land Use,Population,and Housing
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not physically divide an established community. (Draft EIR,pp. 3.9-18
<br /> to 3.9-19,Impact 3.9-1.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy, or regulation of
<br /> an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including,but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
<br /> local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
<br /> environmental effect. (Draft EIR,pp.3.9-19 to 3.9-21,Impact 3.9-2.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
<br /> community conservation plan. (Draft EIR,pp. 3.9-21,Impact 3.9-3.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not induce substantial population growth in an area,either directly(for
<br /> example,by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads
<br /> or other infrastructure).(Draft EIR,pp. 3.9-21 to 3.9-23,Impact 3.9-4.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people,
<br /> necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. (Draft EIR,pp. 3.9-23 to 3.9-24,Impact
<br /> 3.9-5.)
<br /> 10. Noise
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of the noise
<br /> standards established in the proposed General Plan Noise Element or applicable standards of other agencies.
<br /> (Draft EIR,pp. 3.10-19 to 3.10-27,Impact 3.10-1.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not expose people to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or
<br /> groundborne noise levels. (Draft EIR,pp. 3.10-27 to 3.10-30,Impact 3.10-2.)
<br /> 9
<br />production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level
<br /> which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted). (Draft
<br /> EIR,pp.3.8-27 to 3.8-28,Impact 3.8-2.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the planning
<br /> area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,in a manner which would result in
<br /> substantial erosion,siltation,or flooding on-or off-site.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.8-28 to 3.8-30,Impact 3.8-3.)
<br /> 8
<br />s a program-level analysis of the environmental impacts of the Plan and supports all levels
<br /> of approval necessary to implement the Plan.
<br /> F. Certification of the Draft and Final EIR
<br /> In accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15090(a)(1), the City Council, as lead agency, finds and
<br /> certifies that the Draft and Final EIR have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA
<br /> 4
<br />d to comply with
<br /> 1
<br />e use shall be at least 300 feet from an R or 0 district.
<br /> Distributed at the May 28,2019, Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting and the June 26,2019 Planning Commission Meeting
<br /> Provided for Reference 54
<br />
|