2_Exhibits I-J - Laserfiche WebLink

Development under the Plan would not violate wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board. (Draft EIR,pp.3.13-20 to 3.13-21,Impact 3.13-1.) Development under the Plan would not require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.(Draft EIR,pp.3.13-21 to 3.13-23,Impact 3.13-2.) Development under the Plan would not require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.13-23 to 3.13-24,Impact 3.13-3.) Development under the Plan would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources.(Draft EIR,pp.3.13-24 to 3.13-35,Impact 3.13-4.) Development under the Plan would not result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves the planning area that it has inadequate capacity to serve the proposed Plan's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.13-25 to 3.13-26,Impact 3.13-5.) Development under the Plan would be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.13-26 to 3.13-27,Impact 3.13-6.) Development under the Plan would comply with federal,State,and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste.(Draft EIR,pp.3.13-27,Impact 3.13-7.) 14. Impacts Not Potentially Significant and"Scoped Out" Implementation of the Plan would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural use.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.14-2.) Implementation of the Plan would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. (Draft EIR,pp. 3.14-2.) Implementation of the Plan would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of,forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)),timberland(as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)).(Draft EIR,pp. 3.14-2 to 3.14-3.) Implementation of the Plan would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non- forest use. (Draft EIR,pp.3.14-2 to 3.14-3.) Implementation of the Plan would not involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use or forest land to non-forest use.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.14-2 to 3.14-3.) Implementation of the Plan would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. (Draft EIR,pp. 3.14-3 to 3.14-4.) 11 ing through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion,siltation,or flooding on-or off-site.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.8-28 to 3.8-30,Impact 3.8-3.) 8 s a program-level analysis of the environmental impacts of the Plan and supports all levels of approval necessary to implement the Plan. F. Certification of the Draft and Final EIR In accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15090(a)(1), the City Council, as lead agency, finds and certifies that the Draft and Final EIR have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA 4 d to comply with 1 e use shall be at least 300 feet from an R or 0 district. Distributed at the May 28,2019, Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting and the June 26,2019 Planning Commission Meeting Provided for Reference 54