Implementation of the Plan would not have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks
<br /> or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater.
<br /> (Draft EIR,pp. 3.6-18.Impact 3.6-4.)
<br /> 7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
<br /> Development under the Plan would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
<br /> the routine transport,use,or disposal of hazardous materials. (Draft EIR,pp. 3.7-20 to 3.7-21,Impact 3.7-
<br /> 1.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
<br /> reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
<br /> environment. (Draft EIR,pp.3.7-21 to 3.7-22,Impact 3.7-2.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
<br /> hazardous materials,substances,or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.(Draft
<br /> EIR,pp.3.7-22,Impact 3.7-3.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not result in a project located on a site which is included on a list of
<br /> hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result,create a
<br /> significant hazard to the public or the environment.(Draft EIR,pp.3.7-24,Impact 3.7-4.)
<br /> Development under the Plan located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been
<br /> adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public uses airport,would not result in a safety hazard for
<br /> people residing or working in the project area. (Draft EIR,pp.3.7-24 to 3.7-25,Impact 3.7-5.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working within the
<br /> vicinity of a private airstrip. (Draft EIR,pp.3.7-25,Impact 3.7-6.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted
<br /> emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. (Draft EIR,pp.3.7-25 to 3.7-26,Impact 3.7-7.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,injury,or
<br /> death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
<br /> residences are intermixed with wildlands.(Draft EIR,pp.3.7-26 to 3.7-27,Impact 3.7-8.)
<br /> 8. Hydrology,Drainage,and Water Quality
<br /> Development under the Plan would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
<br /> requirements.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.8-26 to 3.8-27,Impact 3.8-1.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially
<br /> with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
<br /> local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level
<br /> which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted). (Draft
<br /> EIR,pp.3.8-27 to 3.8-28,Impact 3.8-2.)
<br /> Development under the Plan would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the planning
<br /> area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,in a manner which would result in
<br /> substantial erosion,siltation,or flooding on-or off-site.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.8-28 to 3.8-30,Impact 3.8-3.)
<br /> 8
<br />s a program-level analysis of the environmental impacts of the Plan and supports all levels
<br /> of approval necessary to implement the Plan.
<br /> F. Certification of the Draft and Final EIR
<br /> In accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15090(a)(1), the City Council, as lead agency, finds and
<br /> certifies that the Draft and Final EIR have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA
<br /> 4
<br />d to comply with
<br /> 1
<br />e use shall be at least 300 feet from an R or 0 district.
<br /> Distributed at the May 28,2019, Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting and the June 26,2019 Planning Commission Meeting
<br /> Provided for Reference 54
<br /> |