|
immediate surroundings such that the significance of a historic resource would be materially impaired
<br /> (Guidelines Section 15064.5). (Draft EIR,pp.3.4-22 to 3.4-23,Impact 3.4-1.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not cause an adverse change in the significance of an archaeological
<br /> resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. (Draft EIR,pp.3.4-23,Impact 3.4-2.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or
<br /> site or unique geologic feature.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.4-24,Impact 3.4-3.)
<br /> Development allowed by the Plan would not have the potential to disturb human remains,including those
<br /> interred outside of formal cemeteries.(Draft EIR,pp.3.4-24,Impact 3.4-4.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not cause an adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural
<br /> resource,defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site,feature,place,cultural landscape
<br /> that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape,sacred place, or object with
<br /> cultural value to a California Native American Tribe,and that is:
<br /> (a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources,or in a local
<br /> register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k),or
<br /> (b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial
<br /> evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
<br /> Resources Code Section 5024.1.In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision(c)of Public
<br /> Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the
<br /> resource to a California Native American tribe. (Draft EIR,pp.3.4-25,Impact 3.4-5.)
<br /> 5. Energy,Climate Change,and Greenhouse Gases
<br /> Development under the Plan would not cause wasteful,inefficient,or unnecessary consumption of energy
<br /> during project construction, operation, and/or maintenance. (Draft EIR,pp. 3.5-54 to 3.5-56,Impact 3.5-
<br /> 3.)
<br /> The Plan would not conflict with the CBC Energy Efficiency Standards,the CARB passenger vehicle GHG
<br /> emissions reduction targets for 2020 and 2035, or any other applicable energy conservation regulations.
<br /> (Draft EIR,pp.3.5-57,Impact 3.5-4.)
<br /> 6. Geology and Seismicity
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,
<br /> including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on
<br /> the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map or based on other substantial evidence of a
<br /> known fault; strong seismic groundshaking; seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; and
<br /> landslides.(Draft EIR,pp. 3.6-16 to 3.6-17,Impact 3.6-1.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not result in substantial soil erosion or topsoil loss. (Draft EIR,pp. 3.6-
<br /> 17 to 3.6-18,Impact 3.6-2.)
<br /> Implementation of the Plan would not locate structures on expansive soils or on a geologic unit or soil that
<br /> is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of new development under the Plan, or potentially
<br /> result in on-or off-site landslide,lateral spreading,subsidence,liquefaction or collapse,or create substantial
<br /> risks to life or property.(Draft EIR,pp.3.6-18,Impact 3.6-3.)
<br /> 7
<br /> 5
<br />d adopted the Plan on .The Draft EIR and Final EIR comprise the"EIR"referenced in
<br /> these findings.
<br /> The EIR provides a program-level analysis of the environmental impacts of the Plan and supports all levels
<br /> of approval necessary to implement the Plan.
<br /> F. Certification of the Draft and Final EIR
<br /> In accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15090(a)(1), the City Council, as lead agency, finds and
<br /> certifies that the Draft and Final EIR have been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA
<br /> 4
<br />d to comply with
<br /> 1
<br />e use shall be at least 300 feet from an R or 0 district.
<br /> Distributed at the May 28,2019, Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting and the June 26,2019 Planning Commission Meeting
<br /> Provided for Reference 54
<br />
|