My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2_Exhibits A-C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
06-26
>
2_Exhibits A-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2019 3:20:49 PM
Creation date
6/14/2019 3:20:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/26/2019
Document Relationships
2
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\06-26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> After more than two years. the Downtown Specific Plan Update and work of the <br /> Downtown Specific Plan Task Force is nearing completion. Since the November 2018 <br /> draft of the Specific Plan was released, staff has received feedback from the public, <br /> various interest groups, and City Boards and Commissions. Public correspondence <br /> received throughout the comment period is attached (Attachments 1 and 2). At its most <br /> recent meeting, held on February 26, 2019. the Task Force reviewed the input received <br /> to-date on the draft DSP. In particular. the Task force considered and provided direction <br /> on five policy items, including: 1) massage regulations, 2) the active ground-floor <br /> overlay, 3) ground-floor residential in commercial and mixed-use districts, 4) land use <br /> discrepancies including property owner-initiated requests for change in land use, and 5) <br /> development standards (i.e., height and FAR limitations). In providing its direction, and <br /> as discussed below, several of the Task Force's most recent decisions were based on <br /> comments received during the November and December outreach. <br /> The final Task Force meeting is scheduled for April 23, 2019, with Planning Commission <br /> and City Council hearings tentatively scheduled from May through July. Going into the <br /> final Task Force meeting, staff requests direction from the City Council on the five topic <br /> areas discussed by the Task Force at the February meeting. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The following provides a summary and discussion of each of the five topics items being <br /> brought to the Council for policy direction. Each topic area includes: a brief background <br /> section for context an overview and discussion of the Task Force's direction up to and <br /> including at the February 26 meeting, and a staff recommendation with options for the <br /> City Council's consideration In some cases, staff's recommendation differs from the <br /> Task Force's latest thinking. <br /> 1. Massage Regulations <br /> Background <br /> As allowed by State law, the City currently regulates massage establishments and <br /> massage technicians in two ways: <br /> • Land use-based regulations in the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC) Title 18 <br /> (the Zoning code), which prescribes zoning districts and land use permitting <br /> requirements for massage establishments, which are generally classified as <br /> "personal services." <br /> • Business permit requirements for massage establishments and practitioners, <br /> codified in PMC Chapter 6.24. Under these regulations, permit holders are <br /> required to adhere to strict licensing and operating requirements, administered <br /> through the Pleasanton Police Department. <br /> Based on concerns that arose over massage establishments operating near downtown <br /> residential uses. on August 21, 2018, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim <br /> Ordinance (No. 2183) prohibiting new massage establishments within the Downtown <br /> Page 2 of 15 <br />ally, there will be additional public review for the <br /> design of these new buildings. It was noted the overall building height in PUD's to be 30-feet <br /> which may need to be removed if the goal is to allow additional flexibility in PUDs. <br /> Public Comments and Questions <br /> The Task Force opened up the meeting to the public. Three members from the public <br /> provided comments. One comment noted we should maximize value and volume of use we <br /> can get on the land of this downtown (MU-D) area. Construction today tends to have higher <br /> plate heights and limited this area to 40-feet will only yield two-stories and really restrict any <br /> additional height/floors. However, given the right location and design, the Council may want <br /> to allow three-stories in some instances. Another comment agrees with the Task Force <br /> recommendation in terms of allowing additional heights so the projects can be reviewed on <br /> an individual basis. The final comment requested the note about limiting PUDs to 30-feet be <br /> stricken from the DSP to allow additional flexibility especially given modern construction. <br /> Summary of February 26, 2019 Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 6 of 7 <br />c Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 5 of 7 <br />