My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2_Exhibits A-C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
06-26
>
2_Exhibits A-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2019 3:20:49 PM
Creation date
6/14/2019 3:20:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/26/2019
Document Relationships
2
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\06-26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Specific Plan area, and limiting expansion of existing establishments. Additionally, the <br /> Council directed that potential amendments to existing land use regulations for <br /> massage uses be considered through the DSP update process. <br /> Accordingly. the Task Force considered various options for regulation of massage <br /> businesses, including prohibiting massage businesses downtown altogether, <br /> establishing limitations on their quantity/concentration downtown, and modifying use <br /> permit requirements such that Planning Commission review all proposed massage <br /> establishments (regardless of size). <br /> The Task Force was also advised of work currently underway to revise PMC Chapter <br /> 6.24 (business regulations for massage) by the City Attorney's Office and Police <br /> Department. When adopted, these regulations will be applicable to all massage <br /> businesses city-wide (not just applicable to downtown businesses). Staff intends to <br /> recommend requiring all massage professionals to hold a California Massage Therapy <br /> Council (CAMTC) certificate and all massage businesses to hold a City registration <br /> certificate. similar to a permit; as well as additional, more stringent operational <br /> requirements. <br /> Task Force Discussion and Direction <br /> The Task Force considered staff's evaluation of options, input from the community, and <br /> the potential modifications to PMC Chapter 6.24. The Task Force concluded that <br /> instead of regulating massage businesses solely within downtown, it would be beneficial <br /> and appropriate to address massage businesses on a city-wide basis through PMC <br /> Chapter 6.24. The Task Force voted unanimously to strengthen the massage ordinance <br /> in the Pleasanton Municipal Code (through the process currently underway) rather than <br /> add policies to the Downtown Specific Plan. Proposed updates to PMC Chapter 6.24 <br /> are expected to be brought forward for City Council consideration in May. <br /> Additionally, the Task Force voted to continue to exclude massage uses (as with other <br /> similar personal service uses) from those that would be considered "active" in the Active <br /> Ground-Floor Overlay (see Active Ground-Floor Overlay discussion below for details on <br /> that topic). <br /> Staff Recommendation/City Council Discussion <br /> Consistent with the Task Force's direction, staff recommends using strengthened permit <br /> and certification requirements in PMC Chapter 6.24 to improve regulation of massage <br /> establishments, city-wide, rather than land use regulations focused exclusively in the <br /> downtown. <br /> When the modified PMC Chapter 6.24 is considered by the Council in the next couple of <br /> months, the Council may consider whether the proposed changes sufficiently addresses <br /> the community concerns that were the basis of the August 2018 Urgency Ordinance. If <br /> the Council finds that additional attention should be given to land use-related <br /> regulations for massage establishments (whether city-wide or for the downtown only), <br /> Page 3 of 15 <br /><br />ally, there will be additional public review for the <br /> design of these new buildings. It was noted the overall building height in PUD's to be 30-feet <br /> which may need to be removed if the goal is to allow additional flexibility in PUDs. <br /> Public Comments and Questions <br /> The Task Force opened up the meeting to the public. Three members from the public <br /> provided comments. One comment noted we should maximize value and volume of use we <br /> can get on the land of this downtown (MU-D) area. Construction today tends to have higher <br /> plate heights and limited this area to 40-feet will only yield two-stories and really restrict any <br /> additional height/floors. However, given the right location and design, the Council may want <br /> to allow three-stories in some instances. Another comment agrees with the Task Force <br /> recommendation in terms of allowing additional heights so the projects can be reviewed on <br /> an individual basis. The final comment requested the note about limiting PUDs to 30-feet be <br /> stricken from the DSP to allow additional flexibility especially given modern construction. <br /> Summary of February 26, 2019 Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 6 of 7 <br />c Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 5 of 7 <br />