Laserfiche WebLink
the item may be referred to the Planning Commission, as the advisory body for land use <br /> matters, for consideration and recommendation. <br /> Alternatively, the Council may recommend use of a more focused, land use-based <br /> approach, incorporating one or more of the options considered by the Task Force, such <br /> as quantified concentration limits, buffering requirements, or additional land use <br /> permitting requirements (such as Planning Commission review of new establishments). <br /> 2. Active Ground-Floor Overlay <br /> Background <br /> The draft DSP includes a newly-defined "Active Ground-Floor Overlay" (Overlay), <br /> intended to encourage land uses that activate the street and contribute to a vibrant <br /> pedestrian environment. As shown in Attachment 3 (Figure 4-2 of the draft DSP), the <br /> Overlay applies to ground floor building spaces fronting Main Street and the newly- <br /> created Mixed Use- Downtown district which covers the existing Civic Center area and <br /> former SF PUC properties. <br /> Ground-floor uses fronting the street within the Overlay would need to be an "active" <br /> use. The draft DSP includes a definition that lists such uses including retail. restaurants, <br /> art and craft studios, and other uses of similar vibrancy; but excludes uses such as <br /> banks, offices, and personal services (e.g., hair salons and massage establishments). <br /> The November 2018 draft DSP includes Policy LD-P.16, which allows some limited <br /> exceptions to the active use requirement to be granted in the Overlay by the Community <br /> Development Director/Zoning Administrator under certain circumstances, including <br /> when no similar non-active use was present within the same block. <br /> Based on comments received during the November/December outreach process, staff <br /> recommended some revisions to policy LD-P.16, including: 1) a notification be provided <br /> to the Planning Commission of the Zoning Administrator's decision to grant an <br /> exception to the Overlay, similar to other actions taken by the Zoning <br /> Administrator/Community Development Director); and 2) an additional exception for <br /> existing purpose-built bank buildings, recognizing that several of these buildings had <br /> been established in response to a prior City requirement to locate banks downtown and <br /> acknowledgment that re-leasing or re-purposing these spaces is more challenging given <br /> their often unique design. <br /> Additionally, staff recommended that the Overlay not be extended to side streets <br /> (perpendicular to Main Street) and recommended the list of active uses continue to <br /> exclude personal services, such as hair salons. These types of uses are typically by <br /> appointment and do not encourage the "walk-in" traffic desired by the other active <br /> ground-floor uses listed in the current active use definition. Staff highlighted that existing <br /> businesses and tenant spaces will be "grandfathered", and noted that personal services <br /> and can be still be located on the ground-floor on side and parallel streets off Main and <br /> on upper-stories within the Overlay. <br /> Page 4 of 15 <br />s. It was noted the overall building height in PUD's to be 30-feet <br /> which may need to be removed if the goal is to allow additional flexibility in PUDs. <br /> Public Comments and Questions <br /> The Task Force opened up the meeting to the public. Three members from the public <br /> provided comments. One comment noted we should maximize value and volume of use we <br /> can get on the land of this downtown (MU-D) area. Construction today tends to have higher <br /> plate heights and limited this area to 40-feet will only yield two-stories and really restrict any <br /> additional height/floors. However, given the right location and design, the Council may want <br /> to allow three-stories in some instances. Another comment agrees with the Task Force <br /> recommendation in terms of allowing additional heights so the projects can be reviewed on <br /> an individual basis. The final comment requested the note about limiting PUDs to 30-feet be <br /> stricken from the DSP to allow additional flexibility especially given modern construction. <br /> Summary of February 26, 2019 Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 6 of 7 <br />c Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 5 of 7 <br />