My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2_Exhibits A-C
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
06-26
>
2_Exhibits A-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2019 3:20:49 PM
Creation date
6/14/2019 3:20:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/26/2019
Document Relationships
2
(Message)
Path:
\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\AGENDA PACKETS\2010-2019\2019\06-26
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Task Force Discussion and Recommendation <br /> The Task Force generally supported staff's recommendations but made a further <br /> revision to Policy LD-P.16 (with provides provisions for exceptions to the Overlay). The <br /> Task Force advised deletion of the limitations on the location and number of non-active <br /> uses when granting an exception (in other words, making the findings to grant an <br /> exception less stringent). This change was based on the concern that one property <br /> owner may be blocked from pursuing a non-active use tenant, based on a prior <br /> decision. <br /> The final language of Policy LD-P.16 would read as follows, based on the Task Force's <br /> direction: <br /> Exceptions to Active Ground Floor Use Requirement: The director of Community <br /> Development may grant an exception to the requirements of the Active Ground <br /> Floor Use Overlay district for uses meeting any of the following criteria: <br /> • The tenant space has been vacant for a period of at least 6 months; or <br /> • The configuration of the tenant space is such that it would have a <br /> storefront frontage of less than 10-feet (as determined by the Director) on <br /> a designated active street: or <br /> • The tenant is located in an existing, purpose-built building housing a bank <br /> or financial institution as its primary tenant/occupant. <br /> This version of the policy was approved on a 7-2 vote by the Task Force, with the <br /> principal concern for those voting against being inclusion of a special exception for bank <br /> buildings. <br /> Staff Recommendation/City Council Direction <br /> Staff recommends accepting the Task Force's direction on this topic, with inclusion of <br /> Policy LD-P.16 as noted above, and with application and the definition of the Overlay as <br /> shown in the November 2018 draft DSP. <br /> Alternatively, the City Council may consider modifications to the policy, such as <br /> removing the exception for bank buildings, to make the criteria for granting an exception <br /> more stringent, or to require additional review (e.g., approval by the Planning <br /> Commission, rather than the Community Development Director). <br /> 3. Ground-Floor Residential in Mixed Use Districts <br /> Background <br /> The existing Downtown Specific Plan includes two land use designations, "Downtown <br /> Commercial' and "Office" that allow both residential and commercial uses (and are <br /> considered mixed-use districts). Policy language in the existing Specific Plan references <br /> "upper-floor" and "above-ground" residential uses; existing Specific Plan Land Use <br /> Policy 12 states: "Prohibit new housing on the first floor of buildings located in the <br /> Downtown Commercial area in order to protect land designated for commercial use <br /> from being displaced by residential development." In recent years, the City has <br /> approved a number of mixed-use development projects in the downtown area, some of <br /> Page 5 of 15 <br />streets off Main and <br /> on upper-stories within the Overlay. <br /> Page 4 of 15 <br />s. It was noted the overall building height in PUD's to be 30-feet <br /> which may need to be removed if the goal is to allow additional flexibility in PUDs. <br /> Public Comments and Questions <br /> The Task Force opened up the meeting to the public. Three members from the public <br /> provided comments. One comment noted we should maximize value and volume of use we <br /> can get on the land of this downtown (MU-D) area. Construction today tends to have higher <br /> plate heights and limited this area to 40-feet will only yield two-stories and really restrict any <br /> additional height/floors. However, given the right location and design, the Council may want <br /> to allow three-stories in some instances. Another comment agrees with the Task Force <br /> recommendation in terms of allowing additional heights so the projects can be reviewed on <br /> an individual basis. The final comment requested the note about limiting PUDs to 30-feet be <br /> stricken from the DSP to allow additional flexibility especially given modern construction. <br /> Summary of February 26, 2019 Downtown Specific Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 6 of 7 <br />c Plan Update Task Force Meeting Page 5 of 7 <br />