My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
061819
>
08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2019 8:53:30 AM
Creation date
6/12/2019 8:53:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/18/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> The City of Pleasanton has used an as-needed pavement line marker and street sign <br /> installation services contract to complete some of the larger pavement marking and <br /> signage work within the city for the past 15 years. Using an as-needed contract for <br /> larger projects allows for cost savings for the City. Womack Striping has worked as an <br /> as-needed provider with the City in the past and has performed the work quickly and <br /> professionally. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Providing as Needed Pavement Line <br /> Marker and Sign Installation Services. Three proposals were received, from the <br /> following contractors: Womack Striping, Chrisp Company, and Tri-Valley Striping. <br /> As outlined in the RFP, the proposer with the lowest responsive and responsible <br /> proposal would be awarded this as-needed pavement striping and signage contract. <br /> The RFP required contractors to provide pricing for common work requests and to <br /> provide quotes for three sample jobs. Womack Striping was the lowest responsive and <br /> responsible proposer (see Attachment 1 for price comparisons; lowest prices are <br /> shaded). Womack Striping has served as our as-needed pavement striping and signage <br /> contractor for the past eight years, and has consistently met our expectations for both <br /> quality of work and quick completion times. <br /> The term of the proposed contract is two years, expiring on June 30, 2021 , with the <br /> option of extending the contract for two additional one-year terms, upon agreement of <br /> the City and the contractor. <br /> Submit • by: Fiscal Review: Approved by: <br /> rry .eaudin Tina Olson Ne(sofi Fiallho <br /> Director of Director of Finance City Manager <br /> Community Development <br /> Attachments: <br /> 1. Proposal Price Comparison Summary <br /> 2. Contract <br /> Page 2of2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.