Laserfiche WebLink
Updated Arborist Report HortScience, Inc. <br /> 4112 Foothill Rd., October 29, 2018 Page 4 <br /> Our goal is to identify trees that have the potential for long-term health, structural stability and <br /> longevity. Evaluation of suitability for preservation considers several factors: <br /> Tree health <br /> Healthy, vigorous trees are better able to tolerate impacts such as root injury, demolition <br /> of existing structures, changes in soil grade and moisture, and soil compaction than are <br /> non-vigorous trees. <br /> • Structural integrity <br /> Trees with significant amounts of wood decay and other structural defects that cannot be <br /> corrected are likely to fail. Such trees should not be preserved in areas where damage to <br /> people or property is likely. An example of this would be valley oak#2 with its multiple <br /> branch failures. See oak pruning guidelines exhibit. <br /> • Species response <br /> There is a wide variation in the response of individual species to construction impacts <br /> and changes in the environment. In general, valley oak is moderately tolerant of site <br /> disturbance. <br /> • Tree age and longevity <br /> Old trees, while having significant emotional and aesthetic appeal, have limited <br /> physiological capacity to adjust to an altered environment. Young trees are better able to <br /> generate new tissue and respond to change. <br /> • Invasiveness <br /> Species that spread across a site and displace desired vegetation are not always <br /> appropriate for retention. This is particularly true when indigenous species are displaced. <br /> The California Invasive Plant Inventory Database (http://www.cal-ipc.org/paf/) lists <br /> species identified as being invasive. Pleasanton is part of the Central West Floristic <br /> Province. None of the trees evaluated at the site are listed as invasive. <br /> Each tree was rated for suitability for preservation based upon its age, health, structural condition <br /> and ability to safely coexist within a development environment. Table 1 provides a summary of <br /> suitability ratings. Suitability ratings for individual trees are provided in the Tree Assessment <br /> Forms(see exhibits). <br /> We consider trees with good suitability for preservation to be the best candidates for preservation. <br /> We do not recommend retention of trees with low suitability for preservation in areas where <br /> people or property will be present. Retention of trees with moderate suitability for preservation <br /> depends upon the intensity of proposed site changes. <br /> Table 1: Tree suitability for preservation <br /> 4112 Foothill Blvd., Pleasanton, CA <br /> High These are trees with good health and structural stability that have the <br /> potential for longevity at the site. None trees were of high suitability for <br /> preservation. <br /> Moderate Trees in this category have fair health and/or structural defects that may be <br /> abated with treatment. These trees require more intense management and <br /> monitoring, and may have shorter life-spans than those in the"high" <br /> category. Two trees evaluated at the site were included in this category. <br /> Tag# Species Diameter <br /> 3 Valley oak 36 <br /> 4 Valley oak 34 <br /><br /> that are undesirable for landscapes, and generally are unsuited for <br /> use areas. <br />(i.e. root pruning, <br /> trimming, setting up tree protection, etc.). The bond or security may be released early with a <br /> certification letter by the arborist confirming he/she was present during said tree work and work <br /> was performed in accordance with the arborist's recommendations. (PROJECT SPECIFIC <br /> CONDITION) <br /> P18-0109 Planning Commission <br /> Page 12 of 13 <br />ed units. (PROJECT <br /> SPECIFIC CONDITION) <br /> P18-0109 Planning Commission <br /> Page 4 of 13 <br />