My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022719
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
PC 022719
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2020 5:05:46 PM
Creation date
4/11/2019 1:16:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/27/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Brown said he was not focused on the number of spaces, but they have created <br /> a small number of spaces with mini "loops" on the south side of the fitness center, on the other <br /> side of the market and cinema, and created a lot of circulation for people trying to secure the <br /> perfect spot versus just continuing the pattern from Parcel B-1 and continuing the same <br /> number of rows. <br /> Mr. Davis said they are trying to balance the need for convenience parking during non-peak <br /> time coupled with the parking count for the entire mall. <br /> Ms. Hagen interjected that part of the traffic analysis will be specific on-site queuing for this <br /> area to assess potential traffic patterns to see whether there is a potential conflict. In addition, <br /> staff has asked to applicant to look at providing additional pedestrian connections between the <br /> two parking areas, to create a convenient pedestrian mid-block connection for people parking <br /> on Parcel B who are trying to get to the cinema. <br /> THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD WAS OPENED. <br /> Angela Ramirez Holmes, Pleasanton, said she is an outreach consultant for JC Penney and <br /> High Street Residential. She said JC Penney is currently an anchor of the shopping center of <br /> nearly 40 years. The mall's success is important to the community and economic vitality of the <br /> City and she expressed support for the project. <br /> THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD WAS CLOSED. <br /> Commissioner Brown expressed his support of the idea to modernize Stoneridge Mall and that <br /> the mall is an asset. He stated he likes the idea of having a cinema, the architectural design <br /> and the intent to create a gathering spot and social space inside the mall context. He <br /> commented that the biggest opportunity is for improved circulation <br /> Chair Allen suggested taking each discussion point, beginning with the first. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor said he likes the layout of the project and the site plan and he doesn't <br /> have concern about the circulation. He agrees with the need for additional access from the <br /> other parking areas, which staff has already addressed, and the parking is acceptable. He <br /> equated parking to be at 3.88 spaces per 1,000, overall, which was not a concern for him. <br /> Chair Allen voiced her support of the circulation and parking and said she appreciated the <br /> comments about the safe pedestrian connections from Parcel B-1. She had one question <br /> regarding sewer, noting that the mall had utilized all of its sewer capacity and she asked about <br /> the implications. <br /> Ms. Hagen said sewer fees are an outside pass through fee, and that Simon will need to <br /> purchase additional sewer capacity. However, however, there is adequate existing <br /> infrastructure and capacity in the system. <br /> Commissioner Balch echoed his support of the plan. He said while he has concerns over <br /> parking, it will get worked out through the process and the parking study. Regarding the <br /> design, he voiced support of staff's comment about articulation of the fitness center building, <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 18 February 27, 2019 <br />e coming up in 2022 and considering the aggressiveness of the <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 18 February 27, 2019 <br />irector of Community Development if found to be in substantial <br /> decibels] at any <br /> point outside of the property plane, unless otherwise provided in this chapter." <br /> According to the PMC, "noise level" means the maximum continuous sound level or <br /> repetitive peak level produced by a source or group of sources as measured with a <br />subject to review and <br /> approval by the City Landscape Architect prior to building permit issuance. <br /> P18-0269 Planning Commission <br /> Page 10 of 10 <br /> Page 6 of 10 <br />ake place underneath <br /> or within 5-feet of the dripline of the existing trees. <br /> PUD-131 Planning Commission <br /> Page 12 of 13 <br /> of a demolition permit, or the first building permit, whichever <br /> PUD-131 Planning Commission <br /> Page 5 of 13 <br />