My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022719
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
PC 022719
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2020 5:05:46 PM
Creation date
4/11/2019 1:16:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/27/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
both along the sidewalk on Stoneridge Drive and along the north side. He mentioned there is a <br /> large area or gathering space on the northern portion, and the importance of having a <br /> pathway, even a meandering path, or some means to get to the sidewalk; whereas, the path <br /> will most likely be for those that will walk along the southern side of the fitness center. <br /> He also noted the sidewalk on Stoneridge Drive and the fire lane, stating the possibility that <br /> traffic could be delayed or slowed right next to the fitness center and he wants the developer to <br /> be cognizant of this. Lastly, he did not prefer the bike rack style shown on page LS-300 but <br /> does think, overall, it is a nice update. <br /> Commissioner Ritter said he appreciates the concept and said it was similar to the new San <br /> Ramon complex. His biggest concern is Parcel B, noting the City will need to zone and plan for <br /> affordable housing. He expressed desire for this to be approved with a Phase 2 and a plan for <br /> Parcel B, in order to meet RHNA numbers. <br /> Chair Allen added that in the next priority session, there are two items on the list that refer to <br /> that issue and she concurred, noting it is a bigger plan. She echoed Commissioner Balch's <br /> comment regarding enhancing the design of the fitness center as it faces Stoneridge Mall <br /> Drive so there is a four-sided design. She thanked Simon Properties for wanting to invest in <br /> Pleasanton and bring an out-of-the-box design that will be of value to workers and residents. <br /> Commissioner Brown commented on his interest in visiting a site in the future, if Simon <br /> Properties has any property in the Bay Area with a similar concept. <br /> Commissioner Balch summarized his concern over the queuing drop-off and pedestrian <br /> circulation, connections to B-1 for parking and for on-site pedestrian access, and building <br /> materials. <br /> Ms. Hagen asked whether the Commission wanted any other information brought forward for <br /> the next hearing, aside from the theater parking, Bay Club parking within the City, and whether <br /> there are other similar local developments by Simon Properties. <br /> Commissioner Balch asked for photo simulations up and down Stoneridge Drive in order to <br /> see traffic and parking, and the trash enclosure elements that could potentially change the site <br /> plan, especially for the restaurant next to the fitness center. <br /> BREAK <br /> Chair Allen called for a ten-minute break at 8:55 p.m., and thereafter reconvened the meeting <br /> at 9:05 p.m. <br /> c. City Council 2019-2020 Two-Year Work Plan Prioritization Process <br /> Provide input on land use and planning-related priorities for the 2019-2020 City Council <br /> Work Plan. <br /> Assistant City Manager Brian Dolan and Planning Manager Ellen Clark presented the specifics <br /> of the item in the Agenda Report. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 10 of 18 February 27, 2019 <br />king study. Regarding the <br /> design, he voiced support of staff's comment about articulation of the fitness center building, <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 18 February 27, 2019 <br />e coming up in 2022 and considering the aggressiveness of the <br /> Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 18 February 27, 2019 <br />irector of Community Development if found to be in substantial <br /> decibels] at any <br /> point outside of the property plane, unless otherwise provided in this chapter." <br /> According to the PMC, "noise level" means the maximum continuous sound level or <br /> repetitive peak level produced by a source or group of sources as measured with a <br />subject to review and <br /> approval by the City Landscape Architect prior to building permit issuance. <br /> P18-0269 Planning Commission <br /> Page 10 of 10 <br /> Page 6 of 10 <br />ake place underneath <br /> or within 5-feet of the dripline of the existing trees. <br /> PUD-131 Planning Commission <br /> Page 12 of 13 <br /> of a demolition permit, or the first building permit, whichever <br /> PUD-131 Planning Commission <br /> Page 5 of 13 <br />