PC 022719 - Laserfiche WebLink

State. He said if the City is looking to Simon Properties as being a partner for framework and partners on the property they would be amenable. Chair Allen asked if Simon has built this kind of center before and asked about the experience and implications on sales tax revenues. Mr. Davis said with theaters and restaurants, it creates higher sales per square foot than for retail. There is 1.3 million square-feet of pure retail and it is being augmented with a couple of hundred thousand square feet of entertainment uses. The existing restaurants do very well and given the amount of office space, the demand has been for restaurants. Commissioner Balch asked whether the referenced 412 spaces for the fitness center was considered heavy or light for that use. Mr. Davis stated there are different options for the facility; they are presenting the larger option that is fully integrated, with amenities that include a spa, hair salon, kid's club, indoor and outdoor pools, and basketball; however, a smaller option would be less in size and scale. They are collecting specific parking information from potential clients for their other centers in California. Specific to Bay Club (formerly Club Sport), there's a significant portion of shared parking; here, they don't have to share given they have 5,000 additional spaces in this location. Commissioner Brown asked if target markets for the potential fitness center were supposed to support corporate clients or more for supporting the residents. Mr. Davis said it targets both; it's a very strong market, given the active community. There's a strong interest from people who think the community is underserved and having a premium product would be successful, especially with all of the surrounding office uses. Commissioner Brown commented that the reason he inquired about the target market was related to how people were accessing the fitness center and he asked if the applicant was only contemplating entrances on the west side, or whether they were also looking at an entrance on the north side. Mr. Davis said the whole east side, or back side, will likely be a pool with active outdoor areas. Commissioner Brown commented on the parking on the south side of the parcel and noted the applicant is creating a drop-off zone and fire lane but that the amount of parking created on the parcel is minimal compared to the parallel parking on Parcel B-1. He asked if they would be creating unnecessary traffic with people trying to access the few spaces available versus just continuing the parking pattern from Parcel B-1, which would simplify the circulation map. Mr. Davis said Parcel B-1 has over 1,000 parking spaces and he doesn't have concern about people finding parking. Mr. Klinzing added that they are in a unique situation with ample parking in close enough proximity, where they can provide a common area that serves a benefit to those visiting the site. Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 18 February 27, 2019 ) cycle coming up in 2022 and considering the aggressiveness of the Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 18 February 27, 2019 irector of Community Development if found to be in substantial decibels] at any point outside of the property plane, unless otherwise provided in this chapter." According to the PMC, "noise level" means the maximum continuous sound level or repetitive peak level produced by a source or group of sources as measured with a subject to review and approval by the City Landscape Architect prior to building permit issuance. P18-0269 Planning Commission Page 10 of 10 Page 6 of 10 ake place underneath or within 5-feet of the dripline of the existing trees. PUD-131 Planning Commission Page 12 of 13 of a demolition permit, or the first building permit, whichever PUD-131 Planning Commission Page 5 of 13