PC 022719 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Ritter referred to Figure 2 which talks about housing opportunities and parking and asked if the Commission was looking at the entire property, not just a portion of this project. Ms. Hagen said there are no current applications for the remainder of the site, but any future application will be reviewed comprehensively with the entire mall, and Simon Properties is aware of the need to look at the overall development for the entire mall property. Commissioner Brown said the reason he asked about the one in six (1:6) ratio was because there are 1,000 cinema seats proposed and a 1,000-seat buffer. If going with a one to five (1:5) ratio, it would consume all the available buffering for the fitness center. Chuck Davis, representing the applicant Simon Properties, discussed the proposal, citing the need for gathering spaces, entertainment and dining uses and a comprehensive fitness facility, given nearby offices desire something more than just shopping. He spoke about an extension of the Development Agreement and the language contained therein, and that in moving forward they will provide a substantial renovation commitment to both the interior and exterior. Regarding parking, the ratios were set in 1992, which is outdated; he stated they are comfortable following the municipal code's requirements while considering peak uses. Lastly, the Climate Action Plan encourages parking reduction strategies and they think using the City's ratio is appropriate. Matt Klinzing, Simon Properties, gave a brief PowerPoint presentation and described the site plan, proposed uses, circulation and their work to create a pedestrian zone on the outer ring road, aerial views, greenery and concrete spaces, materials and public amenities. Commissioner Ritter asked if Simon's representatives have been in contact with the other owners. Mr. Davis said this project does not have anything to do with development on the balance of the site, and that there are two housing opportunity sites designated on the site while everything else is commercial. He said whatever is proposed in the future will have to ensure it is self-parked using parking decks. In terms of communications, they are focused on this first piece. Commissioner O'Connor said he saw the percentages of ownership for the property as well and asked if Simon Properties owns all the commercial space. Mr. Davis said JC Penney, Macy's and Nordstrom all own their own buildings and their section of parking; Simon Properties owns everything else. The two housing opportunity sites adopted in the Housing Element in 2015 are both on Simon-owned tracts. Chair Allen asked if this would be intended for housing in the future. Mr. Davis said they have a multi-family housing group within Simon Properties where they are developing housing. They are looking at the planning aspect of the housing opportunity sites but are also sensitive to what's happening within the City, given the next Regional Housing Need Assessment (RHNA) cycle coming up in 2022 and considering the aggressiveness of the Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 18 February 27, 2019 irector of Community Development if found to be in substantial decibels] at any point outside of the property plane, unless otherwise provided in this chapter." According to the PMC, "noise level" means the maximum continuous sound level or repetitive peak level produced by a source or group of sources as measured with a subject to review and approval by the City Landscape Architect prior to building permit issuance. P18-0269 Planning Commission Page 10 of 10 Page 6 of 10 ake place underneath or within 5-feet of the dripline of the existing trees. PUD-131 Planning Commission Page 12 of 13 of a demolition permit, or the first building permit, whichever PUD-131 Planning Commission Page 5 of 13