My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2019-02
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
PC-2019-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2019 10:09:32 AM
Creation date
4/11/2019 10:07:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/20/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2019-02
NOTES
P19-0027, SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES ORDINANCE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(2) Pre-Submittal Conferences. The City strongly encourages, but does not <br /> require, potential applicants to schedule and attend a pre-submittal conference <br /> with the Community Development Director for all proposed projects that involve <br /> small wireless facilities. A voluntary pre-submittal conference is intended to <br /> streamline the review process through informal discussion between the <br /> potential applicant and staff that includes, without limitation, the appropriate <br /> project classification and review process; any latent issues in connection with <br /> the proposed project, including compliance with generally applicable rules for <br /> public health and safety; potential concealment issues or concerns (if <br /> applicable); coordination with other City departments responsible for <br /> application review; and application completeness issues. To mitigate <br /> unnecessary delays due to application incompleteness, potential applicants are <br /> encouraged (but not required) to bring any draft applications or other materials <br /> so that City staff may provide informal feedback and guidance about whether <br /> such draft applications or other materials may be incomplete or unacceptable. <br /> The Community Development Director shall use reasonable efforts to provide <br /> the potential applicant with an appointment within five working days after <br /> receiving a written request and any applicable fee or deposit to reimburse the <br /> City for its reasonable costs to provide the services rendered in the pre- <br /> submittal conference. <br /> (b) Applications Deemed Withdrawn. To promote efficient review and timely <br /> decisions, and to mitigate unreasonable delays or barriers to entry caused by <br /> chronically incomplete applications, any application governed under this Policy will <br /> be automatically deemed withdrawn by the applicant when the applicant fails to <br /> tender a substantive response to the Community Development Director within 60 <br /> calendar days after the Community Development Director deems thea •lication <br /> incomplete in a written notice to the applicant. As used in this : a <br /> "substantive response" must include the materials identified as incomplete in the <br /> Community Development Director's notice. <br /> (c) Batched Applications. Applicants may submit up to five individual applications <br /> for a small cell permit in a "batch" to be reviewed together at the same time; <br /> provided, however, that (i) all small wireless facilities in a batch must be proposed <br /> with substantially the same equipment in the same configuration on the same <br /> support structure type; (ii) each application in a batch must meet all the <br /> requirements for a complete application, which includes without limitation the <br /> application fee for each application in the batch; (iii) if any individual application <br /> within a batch is deemed incomplete, the entire batch shall be automatically <br /> deemed incomplete; (iv) if any application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn from <br /> a batch, all other applications in the entire batch shall be automatically deemed <br /> withdrawn; and (v) if any application in a batch fails to meet the required findin s <br /> fora proval, the entire batch shall be denied in the manner described in <br /> {00032392;5} page 9/28 <br />rd and all the facts that allow the City to conclude the standard <br /> has been met—bare conclusions not factually supported do not constitute a <br /> {00032392;5} page 6/28 <br />le report(s), adjoining deeds, and underlying <br /> recorded maps to the Director of Engineering/City Engineer, prior to submittal of the first plan <br /> Vesting Tentative Map 8483 Planning Commission <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br />