My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
040819
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2019 5:13:29 PM
Creation date
3/28/2019 5:13:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/8/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr.Nelson Fialho/Dr.David Haglund Page 11 <br /> Preliminary Issues Assessment of Potential Colocation of Maintenance Facilities <br /> construction to optimize and/or increase capacity(e.g., administrative/office space; <br /> "boneyard";the LPFD training area,excluding the tower;and the sewer building). <br /> 4. Opportunities to reduce space needs through shared services—Identify and assess <br /> opportunities that could reduce space needs through coordination of services(e.g., <br /> vehicle maintenance and repair, grounds keeping, emergency operations center <br /> functions and other ancillary services). <br /> 5. Parking and circulation requirements—Conduct a parking/circulation study of the OSC <br /> that accounts for current and proposed uses on the site. <br /> 6. Parking impacts—Assess transportation options for employees and visitors to the site <br /> that could reduce dependence on single occupancy vehicles and reduce overall parking <br /> demand. <br /> 7. Utility impacts—Analyze communication requirements(e.g.,,phone,interne),power <br /> needs assessment to determine current capacity, future needs and cost to serve co- <br /> located functions. <br /> 8. Infrastructure—Determine the infrastructure(roads, sewers,power) impacts and costs <br /> of alternative options. <br /> 9. Cost/benefit analysis—Conduct a cost analysis of each option, including initial <br /> planning/design, relocation, ongoing maintenance and future capital improvements, <br /> including projected cost savings as a result of the project. <br /> 10. Agency cost impacts—Conduct an analysis to determine the appropriate pro-rata <br /> distribution of costs of co-location between City and PUSD. <br /> 11. Implementation Action Plan—Prepare an estimated schedule and implementation plan <br /> to fully understand the commitment required in time,resources and staffing to <br /> undertaking such a project(including recommendations for public engagement and key <br /> decision points(off ramps) for the City and PUSD to consider along the way. <br /> Part 3: Recommended Next Steps <br /> 1. Discuss the results of the preliminary issues assessment with the City Council and <br /> School Board to determine interest in further analysis. <br /> 2. Develop policy and operational parameters under which a comprehensive feasibility <br /> study would proceed. <br /> 3. Identify the cost of conducting the feasibility analysis, who could conduct it,how it <br /> would be paid for,which agency will be in the lead for managing the project, <br /> composition of the project team, and a schedule for the feasibility analysis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.