My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
040819
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2019 5:13:29 PM
Creation date
3/28/2019 5:13:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/8/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr.Nelson Fialho/Dr.David Haglund Page 10 <br /> Preliminary Issues Assessment of Potential Colocation of Maintenance Facilities <br /> 16. Who will take responsibility for implementation of the next steps in the process and for <br /> future project management? <br /> Conducting the types of studies needed to answer the questions that have surfaced as part <br /> of this preliminary assessment will take time on the part of City and District staff. <br /> Additionally, as the process moves through future phases, project management will be <br /> needed by both parties to address all of the issues. A schedule and implementation plan will <br /> be needed as part of the assessment identifying the timing required,various tasks, and the <br /> responsible City and/or District staff member. <br /> Part 2: Future Comprehensive Feasibility Study <br /> If the City and District determine that they wish to further analyze the co-location concept or <br /> other alternatives, Management Partners recommends a comprehensive feasibility analysis of <br /> options be conducted.A feasibility study would determine what site alternative would be most <br /> suitable, whether the project is technically feasible, what the specific costs and benefits for the <br /> City and PUSD would be, and the steps and timing of implementation. It would also provide <br /> policy makers and executive managers with information to decide whether the project provides <br /> sufficient operational and financial benefits to meet policy and community interests, and <br /> therefore warrants a decision to move forward. <br /> Policy and Operational Parameters <br /> A first step before proceeding with a comprehensive feasibility study would be to jointly <br /> develop policy and operational parameters or guidelines under which such a project might be <br /> considered.Examples of issues to be addressed up front include the following. <br /> 1. Operational functions which should be included and those that should not. <br /> 2. Acceptable land use scenarios or alternatives. <br /> 3. The degree to which shared services are acceptable and what those might be. <br /> 4. Acceptable cost impacts. <br /> 5. Future growth and competing public policies that may present significant obstacles. <br /> Elements of a Feasibility Study <br /> A feasibility study for the co-location project would include at the following, at a minimum: <br /> 1. Location options—Define the location options to be studied, such as: <br /> a. Specified PUSD functions(as agreed to by the parties) on the OSC site; <br /> b. Acquire land adjacent to OSC and relocate specified PUSD functions in close <br /> proximity to City operations;and, <br /> c. Acquire land across from OSC and relocate specified PUSD functions in close <br /> proximity to City operations. <br /> 2. Operational requirements—Conduct a thorough analysis of current operational <br /> requirements of the City and PUSD, as well as projected future needs to determine land <br /> and space requirements. <br /> 3. Reconfiguration options to maximize use and operations of existing OSC—Analyze <br /> existing space and uses at OSC for potential reconfiguration, repurposing or new <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.