Laserfiche WebLink
reflect the map seen on A-5 and noted pages 32, 62, 66, 69, 124, and A-52 need to be <br />corrected. <br />Pat Costanzo PCJ Real Estate Advisors — shared a second letter with the Committee <br />which pertains to the Trails Master Plan and how it depicts where proposed trails will go <br />on the Merritt property. He agreed with Mr. Spotorno and would like to see a disclaimer <br />added. He identified nine different pages where he would like changes made and to <br />clarify what could be done on the property. Mr. Costanzo's supplemental letter shows <br />changes to pages 20, 30, 62, 61, 66, 124 and A-15 to A-17. He stated the Merritt <br />property has some key linkages for safe pedestrian and bicycle paths to the schools. He <br />added that pages A-17 to A-19 there is an error where it notes Fernwood Way but <br />should say Eastwood Way. <br />Chairperson Bowers closed the meeting for public comment at 7:25 p.m. <br />Ms. Piekarski discussed the half mile of unpaved trail along the Arroyo Mocho at <br />Stoneridge Drive and how she would like to see this project added to the "other" <br />category with a higher priority due to the connectivity to Livermore. She also shared that <br />connecting to middle schools should be as high of a priority as connecting to high <br />schools. <br />Mr. Fisch, Mr. Johnston, and Mr. McGinnis agreed with the Stoneridge Drive comments <br />previously noted by Ms. Piekarski. <br />Mr. McGinnis commented on page 13 and suggested a maintenance guideline be <br />added to the Trails Master Plan. <br />Mr. Johnston noted that there was no mention of alternatives on multi -use trails. He <br />would like to see future planning include scooters, Ebikes, and other methods of <br />transportation in order to avoid potential danger. Mr. Johnston suggested adding <br />contact information or resources to the final Trails Master Plan. <br />Mr. Hall commented on scooters in Long Beach and agreed there should be some <br />thought to how to address a shared trail in the future. <br />Vice -Chairperson Ritter agreed that grant or development funded projects should be <br />higher priority. He would like to see the comments from developers taken into <br />consideration to ensure the proposed trails are as accurate as possible. <br />Chairperson Bowers noted that language needs to be added to explain proposed trails. <br />5. High Priority project list status update <br />Mr. Nelson provided a status update on several high priority projects within the City. <br />Bicycle, Pedestrian & Trails Committee Minutes January 28, 2019 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />