My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
090418
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2018 2:23:28 PM
Creation date
8/24/2018 4:14:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/4/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In addition, staff removed projects from the Transportation Impact Fee projects list that <br /> are in the Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone (JDEDZ) that will be funded <br /> through the newly established JDEDZ Transportation Fee. All of these changes are <br /> reflected in the attached Nexus Studies and recommended fee levels discussed later in <br /> the report. <br /> Nexus Study Results <br /> The Development Impact Fee nexus study ("Nexus Study") is divided into three <br /> categories as described in more detail below: <br /> 1 . Affordable Housing Impact Fees — New development in Pleasanton will <br /> generate the need for services and therefore jobs that require housing for lower <br /> income households. The City addresses this need through its Inclusionary <br /> Zoning Ordinance (IZO) and Lower Income Housing Fees. The IZO requires new <br /> residential development to provide 15 to 20 percent of the units at affordable <br /> levels. It also provides for the payment of in-lieu fees (payment of a Lower <br /> Income Housing Fee) at the City's discretion to meet this obligation. The Lower <br /> Income Housing Fee is also charged to residential projects not subject to the IZO <br /> and non-residential projects. The maximum amount that the City can justify for <br /> these fees by each type and size of development have been determined by the <br /> Nexus Study and are illustrated in Table 4 in this report, although as with all the <br /> fees addressed in this report, the City can choose to charge a lesser amount. It <br /> should be noted that based on the California Supreme Court opinion in California <br /> Building Industry v City of San Jose, the City is not required to complete a Nexus <br /> Study to charge such fees, but rather has the right to do so under the City's <br /> "...general broad discretion to regulate the use of real property to serve the <br /> legitimate interests of the general public and the community at large." However, <br /> the Nexus Study is helpful in establishing a justifiable ceiling for any such fees <br /> the City wishes to implement. <br /> 2. Capital Facility Impact Fees — New development in Pleasanton will create <br /> demand for public facilities and parks. The Nexus Study identified parks, <br /> recreational facilities and public facilities that the City plans to undertake through <br /> build-out of the General Plan that serve new development. The Nexus Study <br /> includes project cost estimates and allocates a portion of those costs to <br /> development depending on the extent to which the facility or improvement is <br /> required to serve new development. For the Capital Facility Impact Fees, EPS <br /> estimated that approximately 17% of the majority of the project costs is attributed <br /> to new development. As described in the summary table (Table 1) below, the <br /> total cost of Capital Facility projects identified is $405.4 million, of which new <br /> development's share is $69.1 million. <br /> Page 4 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.