Laserfiche WebLink
Pleasanton Development Impact Fee Nexus Study <br /> Draft Report 07/12/18 <br /> or improvement"in-kind" rather than through payment of the fee. The fee credits generally <br /> equal the most current cost estimate of the infrastructure item (as defined by annual cost review <br /> or other recent evaluation of cost) regardless of the actual cost to construct. Fee credits or <br /> deductions are also often granted in the event that a particular project represents a change in or <br /> minor expansion to an existing use rather than an entirely new project. Under such <br /> circumstances, the standard practice is to only charge developers the incremental impact (e.g., <br /> an amount proportional to the difference between the number of trips generated by the previous <br /> use and the new use). <br /> Finally, some jurisdictions elect not to impose fees on certain categories of development or for <br /> particular projects. For example, the jurisdiction may elect to exempt developers from paying <br /> fees on any affordable housing units they build. Likewise, jurisdictions can enter into a <br /> Development Agreement that specifically exempts all or a portion of the jurisdiction's fees, <br /> usually in consideration for other project-related benefits. For example, the City may also <br /> consider fee credits to the Northern Pleasanton Improvement District (NPID) on a case by case <br /> basis3. <br /> Internal Loaning of Funds <br /> Inter-fund loans may be used from time to time to facilitate the construction of DIF facilities. Any <br /> such loan shall be made in accordance with applicable law, as interpreted by the City Attorney of <br /> the City of Pleasanton, and all funds shall be placed in separate accounts on either a facility or <br /> geographic basis. The additional following requirements are also placed on inter-fund loans. <br /> 1. Funds may be transferred between accounts to expedite the construction of critical projects <br /> /facilities. <br /> 2. A mechanism to repay accounts shall be established. <br /> 3. Inter-fund loan repayments shall take precedence over reimbursements to developers. <br /> Five-Year Update <br /> Fees will be collected from new development within the City immediately; however, use of these <br /> funds may need to wait until a sufficient fund balance can be accrued. Per Government Code <br /> Section 66006, the City is required to deposit, invest, account for, and expend the fees in a <br /> prescribed manner. The fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the Fee account or fund, <br /> and every five years thereafter, the City is required to make all of the following findings with <br /> respect to that portion of the account or fund remaining unexpended: <br /> • Identify the purpose for which the fee is to be put; <br /> • Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is <br /> charged; <br /> • Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing in incomplete <br /> improvements; and <br /> 3 NPID was established in 1998 and is not directly considered in this nexus analysis. <br /> Economic&Planning Systems, Inc. 28 P.\151000s\151111PleasantonFee\Report\151111_FeeNexus_071218.docr <br />