My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
090418
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2018 2:23:28 PM
Creation date
8/24/2018 4:14:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/4/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pleasanton Development Impact Fee Nexus Study <br /> Draft Report 07/12/18 <br /> • Designate the approximate dates on that the funding referred to in the above paragraph is <br /> expected to be deposited in the appropriate account or fund. <br /> Once sufficient funds have been collected to complete the specified projects, the City should <br /> commence the construction process within 180 days. If they fail to do this, the City is required to <br /> refund the unexpended portion of the fee and any accrued interest to the then current owner. <br /> Securing Supplemental Funding <br /> The Impact Fee is not appropriate for funding the full amount of all capital costs identified in this <br /> Fee Study. The City will have to identify funding and pay for improvements related to existing <br /> and new developments and improvements not funded by the Fee Program or any other <br /> established funding source. Indeed, as part of the adoption of the fee, the City is likely to adopt <br /> a finding that it will obtain and allocate funding from various other sources for the fair share of <br /> the costs of improvements identified in this Report that are not funded by the Fee Program. <br /> Examples of such sources include the following: <br /> • General Fund Revenues. In any given year, the City could allocate a portion of its General <br /> Fund revenues for discretionary expenditures. Depending on the revenues generated relative <br /> to costs and City priorities, the City may allocate General Fund revenues to fund capital <br /> facilities costs not covered by the Fee Program or other funding sources. <br /> • Assessments and Special Taxes. The City could fund a portion of capital facilities costs <br /> using assessments and special taxes. For example, the establishment of a Mello-Roos <br /> Community Facilities District would allow the City to levy a special tax to pay debt service on <br /> bonds sold to fund construction of capital facilities or to directly fund capital facilities. <br /> • State or Federal Funds. The City might seek and obtain grant of matching funds from <br /> State and Federal sources to help offset the costs of required capital facilities and <br /> improvements. As part of its funding effort, the City should research and monitor these <br /> outside revenue sources and apply for funds as appropriate. <br /> • Other Grants and Contributions. A variety of grants or contributions from private donors <br /> could help fund a number of capital facilities. For example, private foundations and/or <br /> charity organizations may provide money for certain park and recreation or cultural facilities. <br /> Economic& Planning Systems, Inc. 29 P:\151000s\1511118/easantonFeelReport1151111_FeeNexus_071218.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.