My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
061918
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2018 9:12:24 AM
Creation date
6/13/2018 10:02:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/19/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Subsection 7.4.2 of the Settlement Agreement. On January 19, 2018, the Committee <br /> voted to refer the lists of general priority areas to the Board and appropriate City <br /> Councils for concurrence with the understanding that a process is underway to develop <br /> more specific property lists and fund allocations. The adopted lists of general priority <br /> areas includes the following locations (see Attachment 3): <br /> EASTERN AREA WESTERN AREA <br /> • Doolan Canyon Area • Pleasanton Ridge <br /> • Springtown Alkali Sink • Arroyo Mocho <br /> • Tesla/Corral Hollow • Dublin Hills <br /> • Cedar Mountain <br /> • Brushy Peak <br /> • Altamont Pass wildlife corridors <br /> The Committee developed the lists of general priority areas over the course of several <br /> meetings. Each committee member provided their jurisdiction's conservation priorities. <br /> In addition, open space organizations, including the Tri-Valley Conservancy, Alameda <br /> Creek Alliance, Save Mount Diablo, California Rangeland Trust, and East Bay Regional <br /> Park District, presented the priority areas that had been identified by each organization. <br /> The Settlement Agreement requires that the priority lists of properties for future <br /> acquisition be based on the criteria in Subsection 7.4.2: <br /> 1. Properties with significant value for preservation of native biological diversity <br /> and/or wildlife; and <br /> 2. Properties having significant value for visual character and/or non-motorized <br /> recreation. <br /> Additional criteria developed and utilized by the Open Space Committee include <br /> strategic value in land protection, additional funding sources, and willing sellers. <br /> Consultant <br /> To develop the more specific priority lists needed to satisfy the requirements of <br /> Subsection 7.4.2 of the Settlement Agreement, the Open Space Committee considered <br /> available mapping tools, including biological and recreational data, to guide the Open <br /> Space Committee's decision-making. After deliberation on the methods, available tools, <br /> and objectives, the Open Space Committee determined that a consultant with advanced <br /> capabilities would more efficiently achieve the Committee's objectives. The Committee <br /> selected UC Berkeley researchers because of their biological expertise, GIS/mapping <br /> capabilities, and their experience creating similar programs for other jurisdictions in the <br /> Bay Area. <br /> UC Berkeley will deliver a database and maps of ranked parcels in East County based <br /> on conservation values, ecological indicators, input from local open space <br /> organizations, and factors such as potential of development pressure or other land <br /> conversion (see Attachment 4). This information will be used to identify open space <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.