Laserfiche WebLink
determined the new CTC and expanded operations would not create any significant <br /> effects peculiar to the project on- or off-site, or create new or substantially greater <br /> impacts compared to those associated with the existing uses on the property. <br /> Therefore, no further environmental review is required. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> Staff is supportive of the CTC's continued use of this site and its expansion to <br /> accommodate the growing needs of the organization's vocational training functions and <br /> administration in Pleasanton. While the proposed building architecture is attractive and <br /> appropriate, in staffs view the site design and building location appear undesirable, <br /> inconsistent, and incompatible land use pattern with development in the area, and <br /> inconsistent with the General Plan and purposes of the PUD district. As documented in <br /> this agenda report and record of prior meetings and communication with the applicant, <br /> staff has continuously held the position that the CTC building should be placed closer to <br /> Santa Rita Road, similar to the existing building, in order to maintain and reinforce a <br /> consistent and harmonious streetscape along Santa Rita Road, in-line with the existing <br /> and previously developed properties in the vicinity. However, the Planning Commission <br /> found that this adverse condition could be adequately addressed with enhanced <br /> frontage design, and provided an alternative recommendation for approval of the <br /> project, for the City Council's consideration and decision. <br /> mitte b : Fiscal Review: Approved y: <br /> , 4,\ <br /> �ot�Gerry Beaudin Tina Olson Nelson Fialho <br /> Director of Community Director of Finance City Manager <br /> Development <br /> Attachments: <br /> 1. Draft City Council Ordinance for Approval PUD Development Plan (PUD-125) <br /> with Exhibit A, Recommended Conditions of Approval <br /> 2. Draft City Council Findings for Denial of PUD Development Plan (PUD-125) <br /> 3. Project Plans dated "Received April 9, 2018" <br /> 4. December 13, 2017, Planning Commission Agenda Report <br /> 5. March 14, 2018, Planning Commission Agenda Report <br /> 6. April 25, 2018, Planning Commission Agenda Report <br /> 7. Minute Excerpt of the July, 26, 2017, December 13, 2017, March 14, 2018, and <br /> draft April 25, 2018 Planning Commission hearings <br /> 8. Location and Notification Map <br /> Page 13 of 13 <br />