My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2009-22, CLANCY DUTRA
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC-2009-22, CLANCY DUTRA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2017 3:42:29 PM
Creation date
12/28/2017 3:10:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/8/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2009-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. PC -2009-22 <br />Page Three <br />6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely <br />to cause serious public health problems. <br />The proposed project, including the recommended conditions of approval, <br />meets all applicable City standards pertaining to public health, safety, and <br />welfare (e.g., adequate public utilities and services, road design and traffic <br />safety, fire hazards, geologic hazards, flood hazards, etc.). All public <br />safety measures are addressed through the design and conditions of <br />approval for the PUD and tentative subdivision map. <br />7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements does not <br />conflict with easements for access through, or use of, the property. <br />This tentative map establishes the easements shown on the PUD <br />development plan or required in the PUD conditions of approval. <br />Therefore, this finding can be made. <br />8. The restriction approving a tentative subdivision map on land <br />covered by a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land <br />Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act) is not applicable. <br />The site is not covered by such a contract. Therefore, this finding can be <br />made. <br />9. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision would not <br />result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the <br />California Regional Water Quality Control Board. <br />No violation currently exists at the wastewater treatment plant. Capacity is <br />available for this subdivision. The project would not discharge any waste <br />other than domestic sewage. Urban stormwater runoff is required to meet <br />the City's RWQCB permit requirements for urban development. <br />Therefore, this finding can be made. <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the proposed subdivision is <br />in keeping with the requirements of the previously approved PUD <br />development plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.